very rough draft for now ... 
 
The following will help you understand what caused the principal writer of 1776Reloaded to start exposing the crimes of so called government and educating the American people as to what is really going on in America
 
Before we get in to details of what caused this writer to fall down the rabbit hole and spend the last several years investigating the coup of The united States of America, the United States of America, all fifty states, all so called Nations and the entire global governance systems of most of the world, I would like to remind everyone of a couple of important points to bear in mind as you read on:
 
America was the first nation in a few thousands years that trashed the notion that a people should be subject to rule by parasites.  Control of the American people by a parasite class at the hands of agents of the Black Nobility (CROWN) was terminated when Americans won the war of Independence. 
 
I appreciate some have suggested the DOI win was not a real win but a Masonic hand shake to subject the future generations of America to a New World Order. It does not particularly matter since ensuing events sealed the fate of the original organic government (estople) that on investigation undo all of the malfeasance perpetuated on the American people since the early 1800's!
 
It is also a fact that the the Organic Constitution includes Amendment XIII which was the Titles of Nobility Act. TONA is the real smoking gun that exposes the coup of our nation by a foreign parasite class made up on CROWN BAR attorneys and Banksters associated with the Rothschilds International crime cartel and the Vatican / Crown System.
 
This fact further exposes that we have 1.2M parasite agents (aka attorneys) illegally operating in America today. That is of course the foreign criminal agents illegally stealing our homes, children, property and lives on private, foreign contacts that have no place in America. 
 
The fact that the so called High contracting powers felt the need to create the war of 1812 post TONA and then conspire against America in 1822 with the Secret Treaty of Verona  further spells out TONA was a big problem for the Holy See - Crown criminal cabal and it is now the nail in their coffin for it is the law of our land! As we peel pack everything to the last lawful act in this nation we end up at 1819 when TONA was passed! 
 
The Secret Treaty of Verona spelled out that the unholy Roman cult would throw everything at undermining our Representative self governing Nation - We the people government!  The unholy Roman cult Satanic Faux Church and FAKE media spelled out how they would and DID coup our nation in the Secret Treaty of Verona (see unlearn menu). After the Crown agents took control of the  organic government in the 1860's, then corrupted our governance they began dumbing down the American people so that they would not notice that they had been duped under an importer governance and and the nation couped!  
 
 
America was built on a few immutable principles and law that stand to this day. Law based on four Organic Laws (DOI, AOC, NWO, Constitution) which when openly violated with impunity one immediately knows: 'Toto, I've a feeling we're not in Kansas anymore.' 
 
The MASSIVE disconnect going on in America today is this. THE SOCIALIST CABALISTIC SATANIC PEDOPHILE GOVERNANCE OPERATING IN AMERICA TODAY DOES NOT OPERATE ACCORDING TO THE FOUR ORGANIC LAWS ON WHICH THE NATION WAS FOUNDED. The government is not even on the same ship! They are not even on board the same ship:
 
Those in the faux government running (Occupying) America believe they are operating in the Original Organic Government manufactured by the 1787 Constitution, they are not, they are operating a Crown (Black Nobility - Rothschilds) Commercial Slave ship called UNITED STATES Corporation that started existence in 1868 created as a DC Municipal Corporation. It is now as far as we know some other variant bankrupted in 2015. This foreign Corporation never had any lawful authority over America or the states. Its entire governance was/is a FRAUD, made up of private rules and codes.  Those used to unlawfully used to USURP America's lawful We the people immutable Laws! 
 
Now the people running the above have been brainwashed to think that they can make private rules and codes and that these are laws that the people have to stand under! LOL - they are not! NO ACT can be made by brainwashed commies and satanists that violate the American common law system based on the English ancient common! 
 
This actually exposes the core of the fraud! 
 
The ROMAN Cult illegally Occupying and running America through fraud / fiat have made rules and codes to farm the American people regardless of the law of the land! The Law of the land prevents these crimes of sedition and treason. Some of the parasites know they are out of line and some honestly think they have the right to make decisions that violate law of the land that the people have to abide by - such is the dumbing down of those in de facto Corporate Governance offices. 
 
The Crown Plantation managers continue to dumb down the people so that the people believe that they must comply with NWO Socialists in De facto government such that the people accept the will of the parasites and buy in to the lunacy that Foreign agents have the right to do what ever they want in America which of course they do not! 
 
The parasites further are really unhappy that the people have discovered the means through the internet to find out the truth no matter what the parasites say is LAW! 
 
 
 
Now the American people think that thing that they believe to be lawful government is operating as a Constitutional Republic, and yet  the imposter UNITED STATES Roman Municipal Corp. is operating under the principles of the Napoleonic code in secret while its pretending to be operating under a constitutional framework. The reason that those in the know about this coup will not admit the fact that they are not operating under the Organic Constitution has something to do with the following opinions:
 

"if the American people ever find out what we have done, they would chase us down the street and lynch us".

That is a famous 1992 quote by George Herbert

Source -WHEN THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WAKE UP-2008 By V.K. Durham, First written: 5/13/05 JANUARY 31, 2008 snip: It took me from November 17, 1993 until just recently to figure out that my husband, U.S. Naval Intelligence, U.S.Coast Guard, CIA, Russell Herrman- meant when he sat in that chair in our living room with that 1000 yard stare, after being brought home from the Kidnapping, Torture and Rape Incident of October 28, 1993 when he was taken across state lines, missing and unaccounted for from around 9:15 A.M. until 21:27:57 that date, and said [quote] 

"When the American People wake up and realize what the Federal government has done to them; I would not want to be the President, I would not want to be in the House of Representatives, I would not want to be a Judge on the Bench, or even in Law Enforcement, not even a local dog catcher, because they will be hunted down like dogs and given a fair trial, and taken out on the Capital Steps and hung." [end quote]

Here follows another awake American about our In-Just-US system:

Facts About the "Justice" System The "equity law" that the British adopted in the 1750's is a horrible excuse for a justice system. It allows the King's bill collectors to act "as" the King and to "dispense justice" on his subjects however they like without regard for the written law, past precedent, the findings of juries or anything else. Any British Subject facing such a court is utterly at their mercy in a venue that is something straight out of the Dark Ages. The conversion of the British Judicial System to this travesty and the pollution of the British Common Law under Lord Mansfield gave the British aristocrats a virtual carte blanc to do whatever they wished secure in the knowledge that the King's bill collectors would help them out in any issue provided that the King got his cut. 
 
This is a large part of the reason that the Colonies rebelled in the first place. And it is long past time that we did so again --- by savaging Great Britain in the Court of Public Opinion worldwide and refusing to put up with their evils on our shores. So now that you know what "Equity Courts" are and why they are evil, please realize that these evil foreign courts have taken over your courthouses like a cuckoo bird stealing a nest. The British Territorial United States began usurping against our lawful Federal Government during the so-called Civil War and started closing our courts in May of 1865. 
 
By the 1930's their puppet, FDR, had informed all the senior judges and justices that from then on, only (British) Maritime and Admiralty Law Courts were to be allowed here---- and quote, "We don't care what you call them!" In other words, deliberately deceive the people and foist these courts from a totally foreign jurisdiction off onto them. Now you know why the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure tell the judges and lawyers involved in this scam to provide "an appearance of justice". And that is what the American Bar Association has done. 
 
Every Bar Member has knowingly or unknowingly committed High Crimes and Treason. They have all conspired to create and then pillage and plunder public trusts named after each and every one of us. No more evil scheme has ever been devised in the history of the world, and having done it to us, they did it to the rest of the world, too. All the countries on Earth should, by rights, join together to sink the British Isles into the Atlantic --- except that by doing so, we would harm the British People, who have suffered under the scourge of these criminals for longer than everyone else. 
 
Finally, to protect themselves, they incorporated these evil courts so that they could seek bankruptcy protection and enjoy the benefits of the corporate veil. These "courts" are nothing but glorified commercial corporation debt collection agencies. And here's the proof, neatly summed up by Colt Dekker: "Not only is the United States a corporation, but the “Judicial Branch of US Govt” is also a Delaware Corporation (Delaware SoS file number: 3383789), listed in Dun & Bradstreet: “The following is the DUNS number for JUDICIAL BRANCH OF US GOV: DUNS number: 956858625”, as well. The “Judicial Branch of US Govt” (corporation) includes: “U.S. GOV’T LAW COURT ADMIN SUPREME & U.S. DISTRICT, APPELLATE, VETERANS PROBATE, BANKRUPTCY, STATE(S) COURTS, INC.” So our courts from the Supreme Court down to state courts are corporate “policy” (as in police) courts." So, Campers, there you have it. These are corrupt organizations fronting for other corrupt organizations and they have no right to address you at all. If J.C. PENNY can't tell you how to live your life or tax you, neither can THE STATE OF OHIO SUPERIOR COURT. 
 
They have hired "police" to act under color of law as mercenaries to remove you from your homes under conditions of false pretense. They are trespassers in the truest sense of the word. The politicians and Bar Members deserve to be excoriated from New York to San Francisco, from Beijing to Moscow, from Berlin to Seville --- and especially in London and Westminster where these evils took root and flourished and grew in the heart of what was supposed to be the "firm bastion of freedom". 
 
Firm bastion of Bull Shit is more like it. Every member of every police force on Earth and every member of every military and paramilitary organization needs to be clued in and told to do their actual duty. Assuming that the politicians won't do their jobs, the people will have to--- and in that eventuality the police and the military need to know who "the Enemy" really is. 
 
---------------------------- See this article and over 900 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
 
THE GOVERNMENT FROM DC TO YOUR LOCAL COUNCIL OPERATE ON A ROTHSCHILDS SOCIALIST NWO COMMUNIST MANIFESTO WHICH IS ACTUALLY BASED ON ROTHSCHILDS UN CORP DOCTRINE TO BRING ABOUT A NEW WORLD ORDER, WHICH LEGAL STRUCTURE HAS BEEN HOMOGENIZED ACROSS THE PLANET BY THE FOREIGN CONTROLLED EUROPEAN LEGAL SYSTEM CROWN TEMPLE, INNS OF COURT LEGAL UNION. 
 
THE US BAR FRATERNITY ATTORNER'S ARE THE FOOT SOLDIERS OF THE NWO. 
 
THE FRAUDS DESCRIBED ABOVE ARE ONGOING  WHILE THE PEOPLE IN AMERICA STILL FOOL THEMSELVES TO BELIEVING THAT THEY ARE LIVING IN A CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC, THEY OWN PROPERTY ETC: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z0yX9faofCQ&feature=youtu.be 
 
IN ONE RESPECT - THE PEOPLE ARE RIGHT AND THOSE IN GOVERNMENT ARE WRONG SIMPLY BECAUSE THOSE MAKING UP THE SOCIALIST NEW WORLD ORDER HAVE NO AUTHORITY TO FOIST OVER US ANYTHING OTHER THAN THE ORGANIC LAWS THAT FOUNDED THE NATION. That created by the people can not be dismantled by our servants without delegated authority!  
 
Put simply - If Mickey Mouse Inc. get created by the Roman Cult and claim its the American government for the United States of America Unincorporated - the American people obviously ow it no allegiance! Well - thats what is going instead of calling itself Miceky Mouse Inc. they called their Municipal Corp. UNITED STATES and that is what is ruling the nation to this day by a couped congress over the last 150 years that knows the difference! Its authority is threat of force and violence which is why the MILITARY POLICE go off to Israel to be trained in how to CONTROL the people! They have nothing in common with lawful peace keeping organization created under the laws of America. 
 
The four Organic acts that founded the nation are immutable! Rothschilds satanists can not change them no matter how much they are paid by national assasins like Soros, Rothschilds, Vatican - Holy See Black Nobility now desperate to push Britain and America over the edge in to acceptance of the NWO! 
 
This video shows the absolute disconnect between the people and those in so called government! Those trying to violate the law of the land are engaged in Treason and Sedition and the penalty is Death by hanging according to the law of the land! 
 
 
What the people need to is realize is the people simply need to ignore those ACTORS pretending to govern. They need to recreate a lawful we the people Organic governance system that simply rejects - DUMPS the Rothschilds manifesto, all of its agents from the FED, the politicians and falls back to our organic governance framework which is unequivocally the lawful framework that we can live with and lays out what is to be done with those that try and violate US outside of our laws!  
 
Independence HallHomeSearchContentsIndexesHelp  
Source: http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/a4_4s4.html Republished for educational purposes with thanks the publishers for the great works. Eagle

Article 4, Section 4

Document 4

Tench Coxe, An Examination of the Constitution of the United States of America

Fall 1787Pamphlets 145--46

The United States guarantee to every state in the union a separate republican form of government. From thence it follows, that any man or body of men, however rich or powerful, who shall make an alteration in the form of government of any state, whereby the powers thereof shall be attempted to be taken out of the hands of the people at large, will stand guilty of high treason; or should a foreign power seduce or over-awe the people of any state, so as to cause them to vest in the families of any ambitious citizens or foreigners the powers of hereditary governors, whether as Kings or Nobles, that such investment of powers would be void in itself, and every person attempting to execute them would also be guilty of treason.


The Founders' Constitution
Volume 4, Article 4, Section 4, Document 4
http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/a4_4s4.html
The University of Chicago Press

Ford, Paul Leicester, ed. Pamphlets on the Constitution of the United States, Published during Its Discussion by the People, 1787--1788. Brooklyn, 1888. Reprint. New York: De Capo Press, 1968.

Easy to print version.

Home | Search | Contents | Indexes | Help

© 1987 by The University of Chicago
All rights reserved. Published 2000
http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/

 
Now, is there anything in the above that is unclear....? Lets look at the finalized version:
 
THE CONSTITUTION OF 1787 FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America. 

 
Article IV, Section 4. The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.
 
The principles that America was built on are immutable. These include the fact that we are all free and independent. Now this means that CROWN BAR attorneys and other kinds of prostitutes, other varieties of seditionists, traitors are not above the rest of the people. For example a Ba'al Black robed Satanic priest or a law enforcement agent wearing a made in China badge does not get special rights over anyone else. In America - all are subject to the American common law system - whether parasites in robes ignore it or not!  Their phony corporate rules and codes do not actually apply in America proper! They only apply to US Corp lawfully contracted employees! Note that Mandells Dummy US Coro only has jurisdiction in DC's 68.34 Square Miles - it does mot have jurisdiction of my children or in Alameda County Settlement! 
 
In other words - GOVERNMENT DOES NOT have rights above those of the people that created government! Especially when the people gave our lawful government no right to go and form a FAUX Corporate government corporation - styled to make it look like it was the real original The United States of America unincorporated! 
 
As soon as governments violate the Organic law that created it, and its acts exceed the rights of the people - you no longer have Government - you have Tyranny. When you have tyranny the people have a DUTY to abolish government and start again!  This is the beauty of the American organic system! 
 
This also leads us to the subject: 'consent of the governed', which means all people have a right to choose their government. This also means people have a right NOT to support terrorists operations pretending to be government - especially those masquerading as we the people GOVERNMENT when they are no such thing and have not existed since the 1860's.  
 
When those in government violate the law, not  by mistake but because of what is an obvious HARD WIRED DESIGN in their system then why would any American then continue to support it? 
 
I will show you below that the so called Government has been hard wired to betray every American and as they have done to me - these parasitic Government Crown BAR agents are perfectly willing to steal our children, home, life, property, labor, all property to keep their game going on, and their Inernational Bankers making large amounts of cash so that they could invest proceeds in to nasty little New World Order projects.
 
When you realize that the entire so called legal system across America - is ABSOLUTELY NOT in the justice business but in the slavery business then you must realize that the UNITED STATES is no longer America! A Government engaged in crimes against its own people MUST BE FULLY EXPOSED so the people never allow the cancer to spread! 
 
If the family law case detailed below is securitized, the Defendant BONDED then all court cases are securitized and all people are BONDED (as we already knew). If One court District is running an investment scam with arch criminals - HOLY SEE - CROWN Corporation of London et al then every County and District is doing the same! If some Attorneys understand the frauds being perpetuated behind the court then every Attorney knows every American being dragged through the courts is being F%^&*() by the system! In other words - we have a very large number of judus goats stabbing Americans in the back and they have been doing it for a very long time! 
 
This of course means EVERYTHING we believe about the Government is a lie! 
 
This means not only have generations of Americans have been couped - it means the American people have been enslaved [BONDED]. It so happens they have been enslaved under a Babylonian Talmudic Jewish Slavery system! The Satanist and Psychopaths behind this fraud even told us they were going to enslave all Americans before they did it!  This was detailed in a dialog between Arch criminal Woodrow Wilson and  Mandell House, Woodrow Wilsons controller who was directly engaged in the organization of the Federal Reserve Crime Syndicate for foreign enemies. Here he EXPLAINS HOW THE AMERICAN SLAVERY SYSTEM WILL FUNCTION in the coming years enacted March 9th 1933: 

“[Very] soon, every American will be required to register their biological property in a National system designed to keep track of the people and that will operate under the ancient system of pledging. By such methodology, we can compel people to submit to our agenda, which will affect our security as a chargeback for our fiat paper currency.

Every American will be forced to register or suffer not being able to work and earn a living. They will be our chattel, and we will hold the security interest over them forever, by operation of the law merchant under the scheme of secured transactions. Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the bills of lading to us will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent, forever to remain economic slaves through taxation, secured by their pledges.

They will be stripped of their rights and given a commercial value designed to make us a profit and they will be non the wiser, for not one man in a million could ever figure our plans and, if by accident one or two would figure it out, we have in our arsenal plausible deniability.

After all, this is the only logical way to fund government, by floating liens and debt to the registrants in the form of benefits and privileges. This will inevitably reap to us huge profits beyond our wildest expectations and leave every American a contributor or to this fraud which we will call “Social Insurance.”

Without realizing it, every American will insure us for any loss we may incur and in this manner; every American will unknowingly be our servant, however begrudgingly. The people will become helpless and without any hope for their redemption and, we will employ the high office of the President of our dummy corporation to foment this plot against America.”

You should note that the Council on Foreign Relations (ALSO ILLEGAL UNDER TONA), was founded in 1921 by Colonel Edward Mandel House and JP Morgan. Ever since the CFR has been at the center of a movement to transform the The United States of America from an independent nation into a political subdivision of a world Marxist government under the Black Nobility crime cartel.

The Judus Goats behind this coup of America couped congress and then set up a Dummy UNITED STATES In the 1860's (Organic Act of 1871), they couped the state legislatures; they illegally installed the STATE BAR associations displacing American common law; installed the Jesuit Generals over the BAR monopoly Court system to GENERATE funds from the underlying slavery system and fund the NWO system and the FED Rothschilds ZIONIST Ponzi Scheme. They installed certain high ranking Jesuit military controllers running the show to this day, all DC Cesspool Agencies like the DOJ under HR 1326 in 1870 which was a product of the Couped congress to continue martial rule over the American people established illegally at the Civil War by Lincoln - ongoing to this day through successive Emergency War Powers Acts! 

The couped congress since the 1870's controls dumbed down law enforcement who have been duped in to waging war on the American people enforcing foreign private rules and codes WHICH VIOLATE THE LAW OF AMERICA - that law enforcement have not bothered to see of what they are enforcing is even lawful in America! 

The UNITED STATES DC Dummy Corp., mentioned by Mandle House above may have as well been called Mickey Mouse Corp. for it was created without any delegated authority of the people or the Sovereign states!  It has foisted its private rules and codes down the throats of generations of Americans as if they were law of the land when they are private rules and codes of Mickey Mouse Inc.!  Parasite actor JUDGES like those listed herein are those on the front line violating America, our children and the men and women that created this nation to make sure parasites would never serve in our governance post TONA of 1810!

The couped Judiciary are engaged in much more than anti-American activity, they are engage in sedition and treason and anti-American activity.  

It is further a fact that they are still operating as an arm of the Army carry on Military Emergency Government (See UNITED STATES MILITARY GOVERNMENT FM-27 - page 19-20) - which was a scam to enable judus goats to get away with fraud so that they can thieve from the American people to fund international war crimes. 

See here: Pay close attention to pages 19 - 20 - https://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/PDF/FM-27-5-1947.pdf 

Open Document in Browser: FM-27-5-1947.pdf

It is clear that the De facto UNITED STATES Corporation has enslaved every American to fund the New World Order Global Governance system since the 1860s. Which stated goal is to dominate and enslave the American people, all people by using any means including genocide, illegal acts of violence, poisoning etc The UNITED STATES Corp. is at war with American principles that the nation was built upon. 
 
Any American or a wo/man of any nation that openly funds National suicide, their own suicide and their own prison after he has seen evidence of the coup of their own nation is beyond foolish! 
 
Funding criminals and National Suicide according to Nuremberg protocol is a violation of International law and no American or any national of any nation ought to be doing so! There are more reasons NOT to fund rogue government than reasons to fund it! 
 
To better understand this further please reference the great works of Larkin Rose that can be found here: http://mensenrechten.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/the-most-dangerous-superstition-larken-rose-20111.pdf 
 
 
 
Propaganda works best when those who are being manipulated are confident they are acting on their own free will. ~ Joseph Goebbels   The Fear Agenda “The Philosophy of Futility”  Throughout the whole of human history Fear & Anxiety have been conjured up by the Word Wizards and manipulated as a means of controlling individuals or entire populations for the benefit of those who are ‘in power’ or aspire to be.  These methods and techniques have been dramatically developed over the years influenced by technical innovations and cultural considerations. The 20th Century became the century of mass communication and deeply pervasive influence, and the methods and techniques kept pace with the requirements of the powers that sought to influence whole cultures and populations and indeed humanity as a whole.  The point and purpose of these changes are generally carried out under the title of “The Philosophy of Futility“ http://www.aspectsofmind.co.uk/the-fear-agenda/So the smoking gun in this conspiracy against the American people is the passing of the 1810 Titles of Nobility Act of 1810 enacted in 1819. Here follows evidence that TONA was passed by the Common Wealth of Virginia that enabled TONA passing by over 75% of the states by 1819 and it has been law ever since.
 
So the question you should ask - why are parasites running our courts and government? 
 

Organic United States Constitution Article XIII, Titles of Nobility Act of 1810, Law by 1819 - never terminated:

The Original Thirteenth Article of Amendment to the Organic Constitution For The United States of America is: 

"If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive, or retain any title of nobility or honour, or shall without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office, or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince, or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them."

It should be noted that the above applies to any governance office in America, and this includes every Attorney. 

 [Journal of the Senate] and law by 1819 at this link: 

http://www.internallydisplacedpeople.org/joomla30/administrator/index.php?option=com_content&task=article.edit&id=18  

Titles of Nobility Act was never terminated. It was buried by the BAR attorneys who have tried to pretend it was never ratified. To get around it they created the Counterfeit  UNITED STATES Corp charter under The Act of 1871

Its creators copied the original Constitution but made some notable changes including deliberately missing out Amendment XIII.

For a comparison see here: http://www.usavsus.info/ 

For the enactment of TONA in 1810 see here:

See. http://www.thelibertybeacon.com/article-xiii-stolen-crown-temple-b-r/  

Link to Journal of the senate for Amendment XIII: 

http://lcweb2.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llsj&fileName=004/llsj004.db&recNum=490&itemLink=r%3Fammem%2Fhlaw%3A%40field%28DOCID%2B%40lit%28sj004446%29%29%230040392&linkText=1


So if the laws of the land states that American government can not include foreigners in Governance [ Duel Israeli Nations for example ] - then why is the UNITED STATES and its SUB STATE OF STATE Corporations ran by foreign agents? 

Answer: Because UNITED STATES is not an American government! Its an Occupying force orchestrated by the CROWN - Corporation of London, Holy See all of which is under control of the Black Nobility Families. 

They have been coordinating the destruction of this nation since their coup of this nation in the 1860's.   Violation of TONA is an act of sedition and treason the penalty for which is the same as a Horse Thief in the Wild West.  

 
 
 
 
Please note the word above in the DOI, "Unalienable Right... " - not to be confused with inalienable right for they are not the same.... 
 
 
 

 

NOW - if you are born on one of the fifty states of America and you think that your lawful status is that of a UNITED STATES Citizen then you are a part of the problem. The UNITED STATES Citizen is a product of the Couped congress considered a dead lifeless entity, a CITIZEN of ROME with rights granted to IT by Rothschilds De facto government corporation, rights generally granted for a FEE! In other words - those operating under the Status of a UNITED STATES Citizen, as a subject of the DC Corporate democracy, the operates the faux fictional land of the Free and the SLAVE over America (pretend jurisdiction that is legally invalid)! A United States citizen is considered IS NOT considered to be an American National - state national.  

URGENT NOTE FROM ANNA VON REITZ: http://www.annavonreitz.com/ 
The most urgent thing people need to do besides cleaning up their own political status records is organize their county level jural assemblies. Toward that end, here is the contact info for the Michigan General Jural Assembly. 

The Michigan General Jural Assembly is hosting a Thursday night call each week to help people find their own county history and follow through their own process to set up their land jurisdiction county jural assemblies--- call in at nine o'clock p.m., EST, 1-712-770-4160, access code 226823#.

They also offer help through their website at http://1stmichiganassembly.info and a Hotline from 2 pm to 7 pm EST, Monday through Thursday: 989-450-5522.
 

http://annavonreitz.com/citizenornational.pdf
http://annavonreitz.com/uscitizenship.pdf
 
To readers that are new to these subjects it would be a good idea for you to read the AVR posts above and to understand how this system came about and what in reality is lawful American common law, the system that is supposed to be operating across America instead of the Roman Civil legal FRAUD system foisted over us by foreign attorneys aka Land pirates banned under TONA which was exposed above! 
 
 

 
 
NOW LETS TAKE A LOOK AT THE ACTIONS OF FOREIGN AGENTS OF THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA Corp., STATE OF CALIFORNIA Corp., MASQUERADING AS Judicial judges:
 
Not to be confused with the California state, Alameda county settlement in a Judicial court presided over by real impartial judges rather than foreign attorney actors styled as "JUDGES" banned from American since 1819. 
 
To illustrate what the above means on the ground of the California Republic, lets look at a real world Family Law case ongoing since 2005 in Alameda County @ George EMcDonald Hall of Justice, Alameda Family Court [George E. McDonald Hall of Justice. 2233 Shoreline Drive. Alameda, California [94501]
 
Actions of the Alameda Family law Kangaroo Court over the last 13 years were directly TWISTED to enable a  STATE OF CALIFORNIA BAR Attorney that became involved with my ex wife after our divorce to assume daddy duty of my children while he used HIS OLD BOY NETWORK UP TO JERRY BROWN to have a few strings pulled at the Family Courts! 
 
BAR agents openly conspired against me to deprive my two children of a relationship with myself (biological father and the writer) for their entire lives. In the latest episode of Child abuse, child abduction, actor attorney styled as JUDGE Mark Markman - BANNED FROM GOVERNANCE IN AMERICA SINCE 1819 - issued three x 99 year restraining Orders in October 2016 for absolutely no cause and on no evidence of wrong doing! More accurately - he was taking care of his business for his fraternity BAR ATTORNEY that stole my kids by pulling yet more strings in the rigged court IN TOTAL VIOLATION OF THE LAW OF THE LAND while making millions of Dollars for the Kangaroo Court and its Terrorist owner operators as you will see below. 
 
My ex wife and the attorney in question began to terminate my relationship with my children in  2007 after their affair became public and they wanted to begin a new life together with out any baggage from past lives. 
 
The attorney in question was my former wife's best freinds husband. At the time he had a family of four children which the attorney in question continued to see in shared custody after he dumbed his wife. His wife later concluded that the couple had been engaged in an affair before their affair was made public. While irrelevant this and other factors speak to the character of the individual in question, as does his slashing of my car tires to the vehicle I was transporting my 5 and 7 year old girl in which report was filled in to the Alameda kangaroo Court  - evidenced by his wife.  
 
By 2010 this attorney, a shareholder in a national UNION law firm based in Alameda used his influence in the Kangaroo Court system to help see to it that restraining orders were issued for no cause, on no evidence as soon as he showed up on the crime scene. 
 
A BOGUS contempt of court action was brought against the NAME on an allegation of breech of a FINANCIAL contract that had NOTHING TO DO with the Family Law matter! 
 
It was suggested that I had not paid my ex certain amounts agreed in an initial financial settlement. What the the JUDGE CARRIE PANETTA refused to acknowledge was that the financial settlement contract was BREACHED when my wife signed it to the tune of $92,000 which was an understatement of her MICROMUSE stock which she said was valued at $8800 when in fact it was worth $100,000 as validated by public documents filed by IBM for their aquisition months before at $10.00 per share valuing the Stock at $100,000.
 
This act of perjury VOIDED the contract on my ex-wifes execution of it! My ex wife was paid very close to the amount agreed yet I held some back until this matter was properly  investigated and no judge would touch the matter for they were all politically batting for the ATTORNEY COUPLE associated with the ALAMEDA County BAR attorney Old Boys Network! 
 
Actor Attorney - styled as JUDGE Carrie Pannetta instead forced a contempt hearing on me with out lawful due process in violation of a Trial by Jury; in which she found me guilty of 17 counts of contempt of court on a charge that was WHOLLY ILLEGAL for I could not be found guilty of a VOID CONTRACT! I refused to acknowledge the ruling since an un-constutional order is legally invalid and a nullity. 
 
Despite the above nonsense, Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137: “The Constitution of these United States is the supreme law of the land. Any law that is repugnant to the Constitution is null and void of law.” This includes the theft of property, rights!  
 
Another actor - commissioner - Glen Oleon - ordered I go to jail at the time that my children were only recently returned to me after being illegally held from my for nearly two years on another act of sedition and treason by the Panetta Kangaroo court which I had better briefly explain.
 
When my ex wife surfaced with her best friends Attorney Husband as her new lover - she filed another complaint less than a year after I had given up full custody for shared custody which was the the result of her Abducting the children out of state and being court ordered to return them to the state and bring the children back to me which she refused to do! Believe me - this is the short version! 
 
She initiated another challenge for custody suggesting that I was the Devil in disguise and she should have full custody! 
 
I expected the case to terminate on landing in the court but to my amazement - in a violation of the rules - the since Presiding Judge Morris Jacobson Order a custody evaluation! Now for a custody evaluation there must be a change in parenting circumstances. There was none. It was at this point that I realized the new Attorney on the crime scene connected to my ex wife had started padding out the court system  and calling in a few favors! I not suggesting that Jerry Browns Office is was involved - which his law firm is closely affiliated with for I can not prove such an occurrence! I am also not suggesting that the attorney in question relied on Political Appointees of the Comrade Brown because I can not prove this. My children did come to me on one occasion on 2007 and said to me we met Jerry Brown yesterday with Tony but of course this means nothing and is not the reason why in 2005 that I was awarded full  custody of the children and for no change in circumstances and out of no where I was now being dragged through the court and ordered to engage in a custody evaluation for no cause and in violation of local rules! 
 
Morris Jacobson ordered my ex wife and I to see Child Services for no lawful cause other than my wife wanted to control the children by any means necessary and wanted to trigger a custody evaluation to get her way relying on a bought and paid for evaluator! We met with a DAVID KARP of Alameda children services who I previously reported to his superiors for making inappropriate conclusions with out any supporting evidence! No surprises here - Karp submitted a report to actor JUDGE Jacobson suggesting a custody evaluation was the order of the day - despite there being no grounds for an evaluation. 
 
I was 100% confident I was already heading down a preplanned path to thieve the children! Jacobson ordered the custody evaluation from a bunch of preplanned custody evaluators including some that had a reputation as father haters.  I objected to the process, the evaluators and refused to pay for the evaluation on the basis that there were no grounds for an evaluation but it was ordered anyway! 
 
A new evaluator based in San Francisco was selected [Bram Fridhandler] in 2008. He wanted $15,000 to do an evaluation that I NEVER ordered or requested and Jacobson stated my ex wife would have to cover the bill. I would have refused to participate if I had a choice - but the children would have been kept from eventually so I want along with the completely UNLAWFUL process which is a blatant violation of unalienable rights and the law of the land on which American was founded.
 
After nine months of arduous support of the flawed process - to my amazement the evaluator - while making a bunch of wholly irrelevant observations concluded the right thing for the kids was shared parenting! My ex wife was beside herself for she clearly expected to throw the evaluation her way!
 
My ex challenged the findings of her own forced custody evaluation and rather than the judge telling her to go %^&*() herself....  another political appointee Socialist judge appointee of Jerry Brown showed up on the crimes scene, One Carrie Panetta ordered that we have a hearing before a judge Grimmer to hear my ex wife's bullshit complaints about the custody evaluation that she forced on me and the children! This was an attempt to negate the custody evaluation that never went her way and in which she failed to utilize her rigged evaluator. 
 
At Carrie Panetta forced hearing before Dan Grimmer - I was absolutely livid for I had complied with the bull shit requirement of the Socialist child abuser judges and out of nowhere One Rhonda Barovsky shows up on the crime scene! She is presented to Sociopath Grimmer as an Expert Witness! I never met her - she did not know me or the kids and she had never met the evaluator!  What she purported to do was analyze the Custody Evaluators report that found in my favor and stated my ex wife had some very serious judgment and men issues! 
 
In a 20 minute presentation Barovsky proceeded to suggest that I was a danger to humanity and was suffering from every ailment known to man! Any rational person would have realized that Barovsky is lying piece of %^$&! This desperate sociopath truly belongs in a padded cell and she has no basis pretending that she is an expert witness in regard to psyco-analyzing men that she has never met! 
 
One of the telling moments of the Barovsky hearing was this: I asked Barovsky on the stand - how much she had been paid to make the 20 minute character assassination of me, a man that she had never met: the answer was $4000 CASH!  
 
These findings were reported to man hating Carrie Panetta! Lets note her comment in her Vimeo Video - "I really for single mothers" - https://vimeo.com/2146825 
 
Based NOT on not the 9 month evaluation but the 20 $4000 testimony of a no pathological liar Man hating Panetta ordered that I be separated from my children - FOR NO LAWFUL CAUSE and on no wrongdoing and on no evidence of Wrong doing and in violation of the 9 month evaluation! When I protested at the man sociopath she ordered that I attend ANGER MANAGEMENT for every other week for 26 weeks! Now lets be reminded that Panetta is a BAR attorney that has ABSOLUTELY right in America to be in government let alone be a Judge! No one delegated any power to her to try over the people! The power she is excreting is an invented power of the BAR Criminal monopoly! 
 
What this further exposes is these parasite as Tyrants!  IF YOU OBJECT TO THE PARASITES - PSYCOPATHS - SOCIOPATHS STEALING your kids they would deem there to be something wrong with you! Under the New World Order you are not allowed to object to tyrants thieving your kids and extorting you even though the courts OWN kangaroo Courts process proved in the eyes of another unconstitutional process I was a father FIT to parent my own children. As if I needed permission from psychopaths to do so!  
 
Pannetta ordered i see a therapist weekly, be drug and alcohol tested - assessed, be psychologically evaluated on top of attending ANGER MANAGEMENT which I did for 26 session for two hours a session! 
 
I was allowed to see my children for two hours in a windowless lock up for 26 weeks ordered FOR NO CAUSE! 
 
My only chance of getting the kids back was to comply with the PSYCHOPATH Panetta's orders which i begrudgingly did!
 
By this time my ex had initiated a contempt of Court issue for non payment on a Financial  settlement which again was a fraud for my wife breached the contract at signing by stating an assets of stock was worth $8800 when public record showed it to be worth $100,000.  
 
To cut a long story short I was subjected to a kangaroo Court hearing, denied lawful due process, trial by jury and Panetta found me guilty of 17 counts of contempt of court which I refused to acknowledge for the Order was legally INVALID for I can not be held to perform to a VOID contract! 
 
Another judge sentenced me on the contempt issue and for the reasons stated. By this time in mid 2010 I had gotten my kids back by having a neighboring County child services investigate the Panetta order to separate from my children! It took almost a year to throw off the order. The Child services order I be reunited with my children told the court that it had done a "Grave disservice to the family". 
 
I refused to go jail on the illegal contempt order. A Commissioner Oleon had me adbucted in court and sent to jail for five days. 
 
I protested and refused to go to jail thereafter on the trumped up charge. By that time the contempt charge was 81/2 days in jail. Knowing that if I went to court I would be jumped again I stayed out of court. 
 
Commissioner Olen ordered for NO CAUSE that I do not see my children UNTIL i go to jail which of course is Blackmail! The CONTEMPT issue had nothing to do with my parenting ability or DOMESTIC VIOLENCE! In fact the Non payment issue was a civil matter and had nothing to do with the Family Court issue. 
 
I still refused to go to jail! 
 
At the time I told Alameda Sherriff where I was and to come and arrest me if he believed in the Validity of the Order - he never did so! 
 
The DA then issued an RO violation which was completly trumped up. This was a further basis to try and get me in to family law court where I would have again been kidnapped. I responded with a very detailed response which amounted to: I accept the charge on proof of Claim! See attached.  
 
The RO violation was further another trumped up charge to criminalize me - arrest me - as a strategy to deny this writer, from being able to see my children; to enable the 17 Counts of Contempt to be served and give the court a basis to issue a new restraining order.
 
I later proved the RO was INVALID as was certified by Wiley Manuel Court. However, that was after years of trying to have the case voided and after: 
 
Alameda Police visiting my home on December 23rd 2011 (Caught on video), arresting me with out warrant, caging me in Alameda Police Jail over Christmas and then transporting me to Santa Rita jail where I was held for 76 days! No lawful charge was ever brought against me in that time! The Jail order was 81/2 days yet I was held for 81 days in total in segregated Administration for no lawful charge! 
 
Once actors at the Court realized I knew their racket - I was bounced around judges. I refused a public pretender. I was dragged in to 14 hearing and the Court seemed unable to get me to play their game! On one occasion I was taken before a Judge Sandra Bean in ankle chains and hand chains and a public pretender walked passed the glass Box I was held in with the TWO Sheriffs standing behind me. A public pretender stated he was representing me and I shouted out I had not appointed any public pretender loudly across the FULL public gallery! Immediately - I was dragged backward in to the anti-chamber and pounded in to the wall. A Sheriff Ham then proceeded to pummel me in to the wall crushing my knee, leg and head in to the wall leaving me in severe pain! All along Bean continued the hearing! 
 
On March 7th 2012 I was dragged to another hearing and Yolanda Northbridge ordered I be dismissed while the DA whimpered away! While in jail - when the judges did not want a trial or knew what to do with me they ordered up two therapists to find me incompetent to go to trial! This is a common trick in Alameda County for problem cases! You are sent to Nappa mental health Hospital until they can black mail you in to signing something at which point they will let you out under a gag order. 
 
A Ms Swafford was the one that compiled the report on fabricated reports of two Psycologoists sent to the jail that never interviewed me! This further illustrates what a complete crock of shit this system is and illustrates the kids of people that run the system!
 
While in jail my $1M+ home and ALL my property was stollen by the ALAMEDA COUNTY, BNYM agents on basis the home was fraud-closed which of course was another monumental fraud evidenced by two 5 cases in the courts inn which I had proven that CHASE - BNYM - Altisource - Les Sieve Law - Western Progressive were all engaged in RICO! 
 
 
As the cased progressed, the following questions are those that this writer started asking himself as sociopaths pretending to be Judges violated standing principles of American law at every juncture of the case to INVENT reasons for them to separate me from the children and property for absolutely no lawful cause and despite my children and I having an exceptional relationship and life before the rigged court showed up.  
 
As the COURT crimes escalated, my internal questions included:

HOW COULD THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIEVE MY TWO KIDS FROM ME FOR NO CAUSE AFTER AWARDING ME FULL CUSTODY JUST ONE YEAR BEFORE AFTER MY EX ABDUCTED THE KIDS OUT OF STATE AND WAS COURT ORDERED BACK TO THE STATE; HOW COULD A KANGAROO COURT - STAR CHAMBER VIA FOREIGN AGENTS THIEVE MY MILLION DOLLAR HOME IN A 5 MINUTE HEARING WHEN I HAD PROVEN THE BANK / ITS ROTHSCHILDS AGENTS DID NOT OWN THE HOME AND THEY AND THE COURTS AGENTS WERE - RELYING ON COUNTERFEIT PAPER TITLE (ROBO-SIGNED BY ONE INFAMOUS CHRISTINE CARTER) ENGAGED IN RICO, CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD ETC; HOW COULD THE STATE TAKE MY HOME AND ALL PROPERTY, AUTOMOBILE WHILE I WAS KIDNAPPED AND  CAGED FOR NO CAUSE AND WITHOUT TRIAL?  

HOW COULD THE STATE HOLD ME IN A CAGE FOR 81 DAYS WITHOUT ANY CHARGES OR DUE PROCESS OR TRIAL...  HOW COULD A COURT ALLOW A MAN TO BEATEN BY SHERIFFS WHILE A SO CALLED HEARING WAS ONGOING, BEATEN FOR SAYING IN A SO CALLED HEARING (BAR ATTORNEY CLOSED SHOP BUSINESS MEETING) "THE PUBLIC PRETENDER DEFENDER DOES NOT REPRESENT ME" and WAS NEVER APPOINTED BY ME.  

HOW COULD ALAMEDA KANGAROO _ STAR CHAMBER COURT ISSUE 300+ YEARS OF CUMULATIVE RESTRAINING ORDERS PREVENTING ME HAVING ANY CONTACT WITH MY TWO CHILDREN WITHOUT EVIDENCE OF WRONGDOING, DUE PROCESS, VALIDATED COMPLAINTS? HOW COULD THE ALAMEDA FAMILY KANGAROO COURT SINCE NOVEMBER 10TH 2010 ISSUE a FIVE YEAR RESTRAINING ORDER FOR NO CAUSE and  THEN IN OCTOBER 3 X 99 YEAR RESTRAINING ORDERS FOR NO CAUSE...? IF I WERE TO IGNORE THE COMPLETLY ILLEGAL RO's SAY BY EMAILING MY CHILDREN, CALLING THEM - MEN WITH GUNS WOULD BEAT ME - TAZE ME AND CAGE ME? 

HOW COULD THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA CORP  - COUNTY OF ALAMEDA ISSUE EIGHT RESTRAINING ORDER ON NO EVIDENCE AND IN PARALLEL SECURITIES THE FAMILY LAW COURT CASE. INVESTIGATORS PULLED THE CUSIP ON THE FAMILY LAW COURT CASE WHICH ACCORDING INVESTIGATORS HAS AN INVESTMENT POOL ASSOCIATED WITH IT VALUED AT $81,000,000 DOLLARS?  THIS WAS AT THE TIME (OCTOBER 2016) THAT ALAMEDA FAMILY KANGAROO COURT ISSUED THREE MORE 99 9YEAR RESTRAINING ORDERS IN OCTOBER 2016 FOR NO CAUSE WHEN I CHALLENGED FIVE YEAR 2011 RESTRAINING ORDERS THAT WERE ISSUED FOR NO CAUSE....  

SOME OF YOU MAY BE WONDERING WHAT THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA INVESTED THE $81,000,000 IN TO. THE INVESTMENT POOL PROCEEDS WENT IN TO FIDELITY ASIA CAP FUNDS NOTABLY INCLUDING A TURKISH MILITARY CONTRACTOR CALLED AESAN THAT MAKES GUIDED MISSILES. 

IN OTHER WORDS - STEALING CHILDREN FROM A GREAT FATHER IN ALAMEDA COUNY FOR NO CAUSE - TO CREATE SECURITIES, THAT ARE SOLD TO INTERNATIONAL BANKERS, TO CREATE AN INVESTMENT POOL, THAT IN INVESTED BY FIDELITY INTO FOREIGN MILITARY CONTRACTORS IS CALLED THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE CHILD,  BY THE FOREIGN STATE OF CALIFORNIA Corp. 

IN THE PERIOD FROM 2008 - 2011 I HAD ALSO EXPOSED CALIFORNIA HOME FRAUD-CLOSURE SCANDAL TO WHICH I HAD SEEN METICULOUS EVIDENCE OF RICO IN OVER 2000 CALIFORNIA GOUSE THEFTS BY SO CALLED LAW FIRMS. AFTER MY OWN FRAUD - CLOSURE EXPERIENCE - MEETING WITH THE FBI TWICE - I HAD SATISFIED MYSELF WITH OTHER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERALS IN CALIFORNIA THAT THE 7,000,000 FRAUD CLOSURES IN CALIFORNIA WERE  ALL  COMPLETELY ILLEGAL. 

I HAD ALSO EXPOSED CALIFORNIA STATE FAMILY LAW CORRUPTION AND CHEMTRAIL WEATHER WARFARE TO THE FBI, TOGETHER WITH NUMEROUS SO CALLED AGENCIES AND THE CALIFORNIA STATE SENATE / AUDIT COMMITTEE - EVERY SO CALLED SENATOR / REPRESENTATIVE... AND NOTHING WAS DONE IN REGARD TO ANY ALLEGATION APART FROM TWO UNANNOUNCED VISITS BY THE FBI TERRORISM TASK FORCE - ALAMEDA COUNTY SHERIFF! 

THE SECOND FBI VISIT OCCURED WHILE I WAS KIDNAPPED AND HELD IN SANTA RITA JAIL FOR NO LAWFUL CAUSE AS WAS CERTIFIED BY THE COURT AFTER MY RELEASE PROVING I WAS STATE KIDNAPPED. 

THE AGENT FROM THE 1ST  FBI VISIT THAT SHOWED UP UNANNOUNCED AT MY ALAMEDA HOME WITH A 26 YEAR VETERAN OF THE FBI IN 2011 AS A RESULT OF MY EXPOSING THE CHEMTRAIL GENOCIDE PROGRAM AND ASKING THE FBI IN A CALL TO THEIR SAN FRANCISCO OFFICE - IN WHICH MY MESSAGE SAID "WHAT ARE YOU DOING ABOUT THE CHEMICAL SPRAYING - ARE YOU DOING TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT ARE DO WE HAVE TO DO SO"... WHICH THE FBI TOOK AS A THREAT AND CAME OUT TO THE HOUSE TO SEE IF I WAS NUTS! AFTER ACCUSING ME OF BEING NUTS "WHY WOULD THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SPRAY ITS OWN PEOPLE....." ETC THEY LEFT. I INFORMED THEM ABOUT FORMER FBI CHIEF THAT STARTED AIR CRAP AND I PUT TED IN TOUCH WITH THE AGENTS... THAT WAS THE LAST I HEARD OF THEM FOR SOME MONTHS... DOCUMENTS SENT TO FBI, STATE AUDIT COMMITTEE, HEALTH AND HUMAN RESOURCES CAN BE FOUND HERE: #1; #2; #3.

THE LOWER RANKING AGENT VISITED WITH ME WHEN I WAS TRANSFERRED FROM ALAMEDA POLICE STATION WHERE I WAS HELD OVER CHRISTMAS ILLEGALLY AND REFUSED A MAGISTRATE. I WAS STATE KIDNAPPED BY ALAMEDA POLICE DEPT ON DECEMBER 23RD 2011 (ALL CAUGHT ON VIDEO) AND TRANSFERRED TO ADMINISTRATIVE SEGREGATION IN EARLY JANUARY. 

ONE QUERK ABOUT MY STAY AT THE ALAMEDA COUNTY COUNTRY CLUB, SANTA RITA FOR NO CAUSE (STATE KIDNAPPING). ON PROCESSING AT THE JAIL AND WALKING TO THE CELL BLOCK I GOT CHATTING TO THE SHERIFF.  TOWARD THE END OF A LONG CORRIDOR BEFORE ENTERING THE MAIN YARD - HE STOPPED. AT THE TIME I WAS SHACKLED AND GIVEN A GREEN PRISON RAGS TO WEAR. THE SHERIFF TURNED TO ME AND SAID; I DO NOT KNOW WHAT IS GOING ON HERE BUT SOMETHING IS WRONG; YOU DO NOT BELONG IN THIS BLOCK. OPENING A DOOR, HE SAID WAIT HERE - I AM GOING TO GO AND SORT THIS OUT! HE RETURNED PERHAPS 1 - 2 HOURS LATER AND SAID AGAIN - THEY HAD YOU DESIGNATED FOR THE NUT HOUSE AND YOU DO NOT BELONG IN THERE. I LATER ASSUMED THAT THE DA HAD INSTRUCTED THE SHERIFF TO RIGHT ME UP AS NUTS SO THAT I WOULD BE PLACED IN THE NUT HOUSE AS FURTHER MEANS TO PUNISH ME FOR EXPOSING THEIR CRIMINAL RACKET! THE UNKNOWN SHERIFF (WHO I WOULD STILL LIKE TO THANK) SAVED ME FROM AN UNKNOWN FATE. 

AT SOME LATER WEEKS TO PREVENT THE CASE GOING TO TRIAL THE DA - JUDGE OPENLY CONSPIRED TO HAVE ME SENT TO TWO THERAPISTS WHO WERE ORDERED TO FIND ME UNFIT TO STAND TRIAL! THE REPORT WENT TO ANOTHER SOCIOPATH AT ALAMEDA COUNTY WHO WROTE UP A REPORT FILED IN TO THE COURT SAYING SHE HAD REVIEWED THE EVIDENCE AND AGREED THAT I WAS UNFIT FOR TRIAL! THE ALIENISTS NEVER MET WITH ME YET STILL PRODUCED TEHE REPORT! THIS PROCESS IS STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE IN ALAMEDA COUNTY FOR OTHER IN THE CELL BLOCK B THAT I WAS HOUSED IN HAD EXPERIENCES THE SAME TACTICS. IF THE STATE - POLICE - DA'S HAVE SOMETHING TO HIDE AND THEY DO NOT WANT A CASE GOING PUBLIC THEY WILL PREVENT A TRIAL - APPOINT A PUBLIC PRETENDER AND THROW YOU IN NAPPA HOSPITAL FOR THE MENTALLY CHALLENGED UNTIL "YOU GET BETTER AND ARE READY FOR TRIAL" WHICH NEVER HAPPENS. THEY THENK KEEP YOU INSIDE UNTIL YOU BREAK AND AGREE TO A PLEA DEAL WHICH WILL INCLUDE A GAG ORDER THAT YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO TALK ABOUT YOUR CASE! I KNOW THIS FOR FACT FOR I KNOW PEOPLE IN WHICH THIS EXACT SCENARIO OCCURRED. 

IN MY CASE - AFTER I WAS SHUFFLED AROUND FROM JUDGE TO JUDGE OVER 76 DAYS - THE PRESIDING JUDGE YOLANDA NORTHBRIDGE SOMEHOW GOT HOLD OF MY CASE AND TOLD THE WHIMPERING DA BEGGING THE JUDGE THAT HE WANTED ME TO GO TO NAPPA HOSPITAL RESPONDED TO SOCIOPATH DA - "JAIL IS NOT THE PROPER PLACE FOR THE DEFENDENT". THE PRESIDING JUDGE ON MARCH 7TH 2012 ORDERED MY IMMEDIATE RELEASE. 

THE JAIL DRAGGED ITS FEET AND KEPT ME UNTIL 3:00AM THAT NIGHT! WHEN I REFUSED TO APPLY MY THUMBPRINT TO THE BIO-METRIC READER ON EXITING THE JAIL THE DISCHARGE SHERIFF HAD ME THROWN IN A HOLDING CELL AGAIN UNTIL I WOULD AGREE TO APPLY MY THUMB TO THE BIOMETRIC READER. I INFORMED HIM THAT THERER WOULD BE A CHARGE FOR DOING SO IN ACCORDANCE WITH MY FEE SCHEDULE. THE SHERIFF SCREAMED SOME ABUSE AT ME AND I LEFT THE JAIL IN THE EARLY HOURS OF THE MORNING IN TO THE FREEZING COLD; WITH A WHITE TEE SHORT, JEANS, SOCKS, BOXERS AND THE KNOWLEDGE THAT THE STATE - BNYM AND ITS CRIMINAL AGENTS HAD STOLLEN MY ALAMEDA BAY FRONT HOME AND EVERYTHING IN IT (WITHOUT DUE PROCESS) THAT I WORKED TO BUILD OVER MY ENTIRE LIFE. ON LEAVING THE JAIL I WAS GIVEN A A FIVE YEAR RESTRAINING ORDER STATING I COULD NOT CONTACT MY CHILDREN BY ANY MEANS UNTIL NOVEMBER 1ST 2016. THE ORDER WAS ISSUED FOR ABSOLUTELY NOT CAUSE AND ON NO EVIDENCE OF WRONG DOING. 

STATE THAT HE HAD LOOKED IN TO MY CHEMTRAIL CONCERNS AND SOMETHING WAS GOING BUT THEY DID NOT KNOW WHO WAS BEHIND IT! 

Some additional notes on the case:

 
The STATE OF CALIFORNIA Corp.,Attorney and a shareholder in a national law firm became involved with the former spouse of the father of the two children.   The Mother BF attorney conspired with the Court, DA, Mothers Attorney to terminate the fathers relationship with his biological children achieved through outright lies, barratry all since proven to be lies! 
 
The Attorney and the fathers former wife set about criminalizing the father and arranged for the father to have no contact with his own children!  A never ending totally corrupt legal process was used to criminalize the father and issue restraining orders cumulating over 3000 years for no cause - with no due process. 
 
Over the years between 2007 - 2011  it was suggested - originally by an expert witness with ZERO knowledge of the father in question and on NO EVIDENCE that the father he was violent, suffered from chemical dependencies, that  he was mentally incompetent et al! 
 
The expert witness was paid $4000 cash to make up lies about the father who she had never met [cf. the infamous Rhonda Barovsky].
 
Typical summary of Sociopath Barovsky:
 

Rhonda Barovsky is a sociopath she believes her own BS, it is hard to believe that she still has her license. My daughter is still traumatized at age 22 by Rhondas actions of not listening to my 12-14 year old daughter. My daughter and I missed out on precious years because of this women. Her damage lasts a lifetime, do not hire her it will be the biggest mistake of your life. The only way to get rid of her is to stop paying her

After years of Guilty until proven innocent charges the childrens father proved all charges were fraud but the cadre of professional sociopaths styled as COMMISSIONER Glenn Oleon and JUDGES Michael Markman, Carrie M. Panetta persistently refused to REMOVE restraining orders unlawfully separating father from children for no cause. At this time over 300 years of restraining orders have been issued against the father and not one for any JUST CAUSE or evidence of wrong doing! The last in October 2016 for Three x 99 years! 
 

Now, what most do not know about America's In-Just-US legal system is that every case is securitized and bonded which is based on the Existence of a Foreign Situs Trust associated created for everyone with there knowledge. This is evidenced by existence of a Birth Certificate issued by one of the UNITED STATES fifty DC Sub Corporations styled as STATE OF STATE ie STATE OF CALIFORNIA! The STATE makes money from securitizing each court case and gaining access to the foreign Situs Trust associated with the TRUST NAME on the BIRTH CERTIFICATE. The Clerk of the court manages and charges these trusts once the Admin styled as JUDGE manufactures some kind of charge against the PERSON. The Courts are in the Business of Manufacturing charges - they are not in the business of justice or law and order. 
 
To understand the amounts we are talking about, here follows a partial Summary of funds associated with the 2005 FAMILY LAW CASE mentioned above.  The father has now been separated from his own two children for the last 9 years for absolutely no cause.  It should be noted that the Attorney that became involved with the fathers ex wife is a shareholder for a National Law firm stamped on the FAX header below that is directly connected to Comrade Jerry Brown, Governor of Marxist NWO Republic of California.    
 
As you begin to understand what goes on behind EVERY STATE so called Court action ask yourself if the STATE would rely on a bitter twisted mother hell bent on stealing children from a father; such that the state could pretend the mother had a valid case and it could then make $MILLIONS + out of stealing the children without anyone knowing it was making all this money - then would it do so? Perhaps the better question is why would corrupt sociopath judges not betray the father and the children and make as much cash as possible ignoring law of the land and violating the children and the father?
 
If the STATES CORRUPT judges could make so much money from persecuting innocent children, fathers, mothers then we can perhaps see why in America there are 2.5 Million people in jail and why MILLIONS more are being entrapped by the UNITED STATES Kangaroo Court [BANKING] system at this time! 
 
Once you get what is being stated here you will realize the COUPED STATE OF STATE Corporations and the UNITED STATES, including the couped congress are nothing more than a terrorist operation for foreign International Banksters that stand behind the FED and are named below! 
 
In this case alone, SUPERIOR COURT OF ALAMEDA kept an exemplary father from his children for no cause and failed to mention that the court was engaged in banking exercise. This of course destroys the notion that California Family Law courts  are driven by a Policy about the Best Interests of the Children. 
 
One must ask what incentive does the court have to give the children back to the father or to expose the mothers lies, and prima facie FRAUD when it can make so much money by looking the other way and perpetuating crimes against humanity. The actor judges engaging in these crimes can stand on the fact that  other corrupted judges inside the kangaroo court system will always cover up other judges crimes as they have done throughout this case. You will note a Meme above relating to Rule 1.6. what that is about is if someone exposes corruption in a Case the Supreme Court has suggested the States will HUSH up the corruption! 
 
 
In the case at hand the court did everything possible to block the father from exposing the fact that the Attorney in question was directly medaling in the: Family Law Case, criminal case; and did actively conspire with the DA. It was ABSOLUTELY biased toward the mother and separating the children from the father. Even when it ordered special investigations that found in the fathers favor the Court ignored the finding yet it paid attention to unfounded testimony from those that had never met the father like the $4000 20 minute Testimony in front of Sociopath Dan Grimmer who allowed the testimony of Barovsky knowing she was being paid to lie and frame the childrens father. It should be noted that all judges that violates the father were Political appointees offJerry Brown who happens to be directly connected to the Attorney that stepped in to father the children after the real biological father was removed by Sociopath actors pretending to be judges! 
 
The following shows the mothers Attorney Boyfriends firm were writing Briefs for the Mothers attorney as shown below. This was pointed out to Judges and they just ignored the ethical violations and carried on pretending there was some reason to separate the father from the children.
 
In 2010 the courts illegal separation of the children from their father by Sociopath Panetta WAS INVESTIGATED by a neighboring county 26 year old Children Services investigator.  She stated that the court had done the family a grave disservice and ordered sociopath COMMISSIONER GLEN OLEON to give the children back to the father which he reluctantly did do until he found another reason to separate the children from the father as explained below!  
 
The image below shows a fax was bounced from mothers attorney to the mother Boyfriends law firm which was then filed in to the court as a brief laying manufactured grounds to separate father from the children even though a 9 month forced custody evaluation found for joint custody.
 
The image openly shows that the mothers Attorney was actively interfering with the case and conspiring with mothers attorney against the father and the children! Charges were intended to allow the couple to thieve the fathers biological children by criminalizing the father on trumped up charges proved to be FRAUD  
 
As can be seen the father foisted in to the above case was fighting virtually unlimited resources of a National law firm that was conspiring with ALAMEDA DA. Father was simply trying to co-parent the children after joint custody was settled on after the mother had abducted the children one year prior and court ordered back to the State with the children! 
 
The mother and her STATE OF CALIFORNIA attorney boyfriend moved a criminal case against the father through the DA's office for no lawful cause on trumped up charges. During the trial the mothers Attorney boyfriend sat next to the DA throughout the case that the mother instigated against the father (likely thrown to the DA by the mother boyfriend) on yet more trumped up charges in which the father represented himself!  In the criminal case a JURY moved to throw out ALL charges and the law and a Judge - Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers told the Jury that the Jury could not throw out the charge. This is the crime of Jury Tampering! The Jury wanted to exercise their right of Jury Nullification and was coerced! The Jury put their conclusion in writing! 
 
On December 23rd 2011 the father was kidnapped from inside his home on no warrant - all caught on Camera and jailed for 81 days on false charges initiated by the DA on an alleged RO breach. The allegations were a total fabrication for more reasons than can be explained here and now, save to say - there was no lawful RO order in place and the court had separated the father from his children because he would not go to jail on a TRUMPED contempt of court order that ignored a $92,000 prima facie perjury by the mother. The CARRIE PANETTA Court issued 17 Counts of contempt all in absolute violation of the facts - the breached contract and with out any due process. The order was an unconstitutional order and the father refused the jail sentence as was his right! 
 
 
 
To force the father to go to jail the court separated father from his children which was blackmail! The Order below states - if you do not go to jail you cant see your children! You will note the order was not a DV order and their was no DV. 
 
The court said it issued a RO but in 2017 it was found out that no such RO was ever issued! Father was asked to sign an order in 2017 for a 2011 hearing which was refused.  Some clerk from the Kangaroo Court signed the from a January 19th 2011 hearing in July 2017 in place for the judges Signature. This exposed the fact the orders layered from the 2011 hearing were all entirely fraud! The technical term is a simulated legal process, from a simulated court, with simulated evidence, relying on simulated judges, in the simulated STATE OF CALIFORNIA Corp., which in fact is a DC Sub Corporation masquerading as the physical de jure state of California!  
 
It was during this period that the DA suggested that the father breached an RO that was on its face a BOGUS RO issued for no DV. 
 
In fact the events that triggered the RO was the fathers communications with the childrens school and the mothers attorney in which correspondence was sent to the school refusing the School authorization to force Vaccinations on the Children. Fathers concern was the Gardasil vaccine which was being pushed by STATE OF CALIFORNIA on to young girls which was and still is injuring girls: 
 
 

170 Deaths Following Gardasil Reported to VAERS as of August 2014

"Gardasil will become the greatest medical scandal of all times because at some point in time, the evidence will add up to prove that this vaccine, technical and scientific feat that it may be, has absolutely no effect on cervical cancer and that all the very many adverse effects which destroy lives and even kill, serve no other purpose than to generate profit for the manufacturers." - Dr Bernard Dalbergue
 
It does not take a rocket scientist to realize if the kangaroo court can keep creating BONDS by extending manufactured controversies moving through the courts. Those manufactured by banned foreign agents created out of thin air - with superior knowledge of the legal system and to screw those dragged through it . As a result we can all see why no justice is available in the UNITED STATES and STATE OF STATEs under the current  Kangaroo Court system! 
 
Pursuant to “No one can serve two masters” (Matthew 6:24), court and its agents (I cant bring myself to call them judges) either serve Justice and the law or making money. After reading on you will be under no illusion as to what business the Couped In-Just-US Court systems dry docked across the UNITED STATES Courts are engaged in.  Now lets see where Alameda County is investing the money that it made in this slavery scam! 
 
 
The document below details of the system that is used to manage the funds created in the Kangaroo Courts which are moved to the Banksters at the end of every day. I hope you will agree - if the Court is engaged in Banking then it can not also be engaged in Justice! The incentive for the Kangaroo Court is making money through dirty tricks and NONE OF THIS is relayed to those being dragged through the Kangaroo Court! Now - all attorneys are aware of this fraud and they say nothing! They are under Oath to keep it quite! So those Americans that find about this racket aka RICO are labeled Sovereign Citizens to try and shut them up and from exposing theses dirty secrets to the American people! In the case at hand, the Mother was the one that brought in to court Southern Poverty Law Center Hate Speech documents to suggest that because the father was exposing the criminal guts of the Court and the fact that it was operating outside of American common law system that the father was a Sovereign Citizen! The entire Sovereign Citizen label are lies manufactured by the ZIONIST Terrorist operation like the ADL and SPLC which topic is covered in the following article. 
 
 
LISTEN TO THE FOLLOWING AUDIO TO UNDERSTAND THAT WE ARE BEING TRAFFICKED BY GOVERNMENT AND THE BANKS! 
 
 
 
 
It is truly tragic that the good men and women who work for so called government are fed such out and out lies by their superiors. Like the rest of us, it is very difficult to do the right thing when deceived and manipulated by Government INC and Business INC (Inc. the BEAST) who are now all controlled by TheMoneyMasters. 
 
Perhaps those awakening can help us all take our country back from the corrupt politicians and the the international corporations who now rule it? Perhaps they will take a close look at DALE Vs UNITED STATES and begin to comprehend the massive fraud that has been perpetrated on us all! Or . . . perhaps they will listen to the conversations on talkshoe radio of those who are getting paid NOTHING to attempt to clean up a ‘legal’ mess they didn’t even make!
 
Read the CRIS report that exposes this monumental crime against humanity and the slavery of the American people by US Inc and the parasitic BAR Attoreys:
 
Loading...
 
If you can not see the document via the above PDF Viewer please find a direct link to the document below. 
 
 
Please note the existence of CRIS exposes UNITED STATES and STATE OF STATES, All Banks, The FED, all Law enforcement chiefs, the entire echelon of banking in the UNITED STATES Machinery are aware that the entire US System operates on slavery - human traficking! Judges, Attorneys are Prostitutes and pimps and they are pimping the American people! All are engaged in 18 U.S. Code § 242 Deprivation of Rights under COLOR OF LAW... C.R.I.S. - shows how the Court System for the "CORPORATION ONLY" is using our Ignorance of Law … “United States” means — (A) a Federal Corporation.” ~ Under Title 28 U.S. Code § 3002 subsections 15 and 15(A) ~ (18 U.S. Code § 242 Deprivation of rights, under color of law) ~ FRAUD HAS ZERO EXPIRATION DATE ~ (18 U.S. Code § 4), (18 § 1201), No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional Color Of Law, Corporate Policy or Corporate Code "and no courts are bound to enforce it" .
 
 
In 1871-78 an additional meaning was given to “United States” via a process set in motion by the Act of 1871: The Legislative Act of February 21, 1871, Forty-first Congress, Session III, Chapter 62, page 419, Congress chartered a Federal Company entitled “United States,” a/k/a “US Inc.,” a “Commercial Agency” originally designated as “Washington, D.C.” Though the Act of 1871 was repealed, its legislative intent was merely chopped up and subsequently passed via this process: “An Act Providing a Permanent Form of Government for the District of Columbia,” ch. 180, sec. 1, 20 Stat. 102, June 11, 1878, to remain and continue as a municipal corporation (brought forward from the Act of 1871, as provided in the Act of March 2, 1877, amended and approved March 9, 1878, Revised Statutes of the United States Relating to the District of Columbia . . . 1873–’74 (in force as of December 1, 1873), sec. 2, p. 2); as amended by the Act of June 28, 1935, 49 Stat. 430, ch. 332, sec. 1 (Title 1, Section 102, District of Columbia Code (1940)) .
 
As the actual District of Columbia was set up in 1790 and fully chartered by 1801, the aim of the Act of 1871 is, as it must be, merely to set up the “United States Corp”. This process of legislation created a private corporation owned by the actual government of the District of Columbia. Thus the only government created was that of any private corporation which determines its own administrative rules and structures…….that is, the US Corp dba “UNITED STATES” is not merely the adopted doing business name of an incorporated municipality (District of Columbia)— it is also the name of a private corporation (District of Columbia Municipal Corporation) that was created by the acting Congress via the Act of 1877 and as amended ever since. This is confirmed by Title 28 3002 (15) (A) (B) (C), which states unequivocally that the UNITED STATES is also the name of a corporation, as just demonstrated from the public records ... This is your Notice of these facts.
 
  
Please note that NOT only are these parasites engaging in slavery of every American, they are directing the funds stollen to invest in NWO companies that benefit their Military Industrial Complex system!  
 
 
 
Loading...
 
 
In the above case, proceeds from the fund create by stealing children, giving them to a BAR attorney of the STATE SYSTEM, and crimianlizing the father for no lawful cause created funds that Alameda County invested in the following Turkish Military contractor.... 
 
 
What does ASELSAN Do?
 
Here is one thing they do... 
 
Lets be reminded what the Mission Statement is for the  Alameda Kangaroo Court system:
 
 
Despite the above statements being MISLEADING AND UNTRUE CLAIMS and absolute garbage, there is an irony in the Above Mission and Vision Statement, especially when read with the following Mar 19, 2018 post from DA Nancy O’Malley: Announces Settlement with Costco & SF Gourmet Coffee

Alameda County DA Nancy O'Malley Announces Settlement over the Misleading an Untrue Claims of Plastic Coffee Pods which can be found here: http://www.alcoda.org/newsroom/2018/mar/costco_and_sf_gourmet_coffee_settlement

Excerpt:  Alameda County District Attorney Nancy E. O’Malley announced today that her office, along with 24 other District Attorney’s Offices in California, settled a consumer protection action against Costco Wholesale Corporation, Inc., and JBR, Inc., a coffee company headquartered in Roseville, CA, which does business as San Francisco Bay Gourmet Coffee and the Rogers Family Company. The settlement was based on allegations that the companies sold plastic coffee pods, labeled with untrue and misleading marketing claims, including statements related to biodegradability and compostability. A stipulated final judgment settling the matter was issued by Alameda County Superior Court Judge Morris Jacobson.

I will come back at some point to point out the list of crimes that Alameda County has engaged in! They are the last Authority that has any credibility to go after other companies to suggest that they they have made Misleading and Untrue Claims! 


  Here are a few points that our we or our Children were not told at school, and were instead given a whole bunch of 

Misleading and Untrue Claims indead! 

STATUTES REPLACED WITH INTERNATIONAL LAW

CIRCA 1933

December 9th 1945 International Organization Immunities Act relinquished every public office of the United States to the United Nations.

http://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/decad034.asp 

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode22/usc_sec_22_00000288—-000-notes.html

GOVERNMENT AGENT ACTING AS AN [OFFSHORE] STATUTE MERCHANT

Whatever the form in which the Government functions, anyone entering into an arrangement with the Government takes the risk of having accurately ascertained that he who purports to act for the Government stays within the bounds of his authority.

The scope of this authority may be explicitly defined by Congress or be limited by delegated legislation, properly exercised through the rule-making power. And this is so even though, as here, the agent himself may have been unaware of the limitations upon his authority. See, e.g., Utah Power & Light Co. v. United States, 243 U.S. 389. 409, 391; United States v. Stewart, 311 U.S. 60, 70, 108, and see, generally, In re Floyd Acceptances, 7 Wall. 666);

NEITHER THE FOR PROFIT GOVERNMENT NOR THE [FOREIGN] STATUTE MERCHANT/AGENT HAS ACCESS TO SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY

As a member of a corporation, a government never exercises its sovereignty. It acts merely as a corporator, and exercises no other power in the management of the affairs of the corporation, than are expressly given by the incorporating act. Suits brought by or against it are not understood to be brought by or against the United States. The government, by becoming a corporator, lays down its sovereignty, so far as respects the transaction of the corporation, and exercises no power or privilege which is not derived from the charter.); U.S. v. Georgia-Pacific Co., 421 F.2d 92, 101 (9th Cir. 1970) (Government may also be bound by the doctrine of equitable estoppel if acting in proprietary [for profit nature ] rather than sovereign capacity); the “Savings to Suitor Clause” is also available for addressing mercantile and admiralty matters aka “civil process” at the common law and within a state court.

THE REASON WHY THE LAW OF NECESSITY AND FULL DISCLOSURE GOING TO SPECIFICITY COMES INTO PLAY IN COMMERCIAL PROCEEDINGS ONCE YOU’RE SUMMONED INTO ANY OF THESE PRIVATE MERCANTILE CORPORATE COURTS

Title 8, 22 & 28 USC

December 26th 1933 49 Statute 3097 Treaty Series 881 (Convention on Rights and Duties of States) stated CONGRESS replaced STATUTES with international law, placing all states under international law.

December 9th 1945 International Organization Immunities Act relinquished every public office of the United States to the United Nations.

22 CFR 92.12-92.31 FR Heading “Foreign Relationship” states that an oath is required to take office.

Title 8 USC 1481 stated once an oath of office is taken citizenship is relinquished, thus you become a foreign entity, agency, or state. That means every public office is a foreign state, including all political subdivisions. (i.e. every single court and that courts personnel is considered a separate foreign entity)

Title 22 USC (Foreign Relations and Intercourse) Chapter 11 identifies all public officials as foreign agents.

Title 28 USC 3002 Section 15A states that the United States is a Federal Corporation and not a Government, including the Judiciary Procedural Section.

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) 4j states that the Court jurisdiction and immunity fall under a foreign State.

The 11th Amendment states “The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of an Foreign State.” (A foreign entity, agency, or state cannot bring any suit against a United States citizen without abiding the following procedure.)

Title 22 CFR 93.1-93.2 states that the Department of State has to be notified of any suit, and in turn has to notify the United States citizen of said suit.

Title 28 USC 1330 states that the United States District Court has to grant permission for the suit to be pursued once the court has been supplied sufficient proof that the United States citizen is actually a corporate entity.

Title 28 USC 1608 I have Absolute Immunity as a Corporation

Title 28 USC 1602-1611 (Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act) allows the jurisdiction of a court to be challenged, and a demand of proper jurisdiction to be stated.

July 27th 1868 15 Statutes at Large Chapter 249 Section 1 “Acts Concerning American Citizens in a Foreign State”, expatriation, is what is broken when jurisdiction is demanded, and it is not met with an answer.

Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12b 6 the prosecution has failed to provide adequate proof that the parties involved in this situation are actually corporate entities. I have provided ample proof that the prosecution and other agents are actually corporations.

1950 81st Congress Investigated the Lawyers Guild and determined that the B.A.R. Association by definition is founded and run by communists. Thus any elected official that is a member of the B.A.R. will only be loyal to the B.A.R. entity and never have allegiance to the people.


 

Please all note that the UNITED STATES Corp. is LOCATED IN the District of Columbia. It is operating a CORPORATE Democracy, and its citizens are CORPORATE US citizen chattel of the UNITED STATES Corp.

“Congress is the supreme legislative body of District of Columbia; District of Columbia is a municipal corporation, and not department of government, or sovereignty, and while, in sense, it may be called state, it is such in very qualified sense." _Metropolitan R. Co. v District of Columbia (1889) 132 US 1, 33 L Ed 231, 10 S Ct 19.

"UCC § 9-307 (h) [Location of United States.]

The United States is located in the District of Columbia."

I hope you're following this. If the United States is LOCATED IN the District of Columbia, and District of Columbia is a municipal CORPORATION, then OBVIOUSLY United States is a CORPORATION... and corporations have no parity with the living and therefore no authority over people on the land, EXCEPT through lawful CONTRACT. Yet - every contracted they have foisted the people under are based on FRAUD according to American common law! 

 
A SUGGESTION TO ALL AMERICANS - IF GOVERNMENT IS NOT ENFORCING TONA ITS NOT AN AMERICAN GOVERNMENT - IT IS AN OCCUPATION FORCE THIEVING FROM AMERICA and its people.  
 
To counter this 1776Reloaded.org is suggesting a policy of ATONAMENT in response: 
 
the action of enforcing TONA (1819 ratified Titles of Nobility Act) on all those illegally operating in STATE OF STATE and UNITED STATES governance in America.  It can be be plainly seen that every act enacted Post TONA's 1819 ratification that violated TONA is INVALID for fraud!  Violating TONA is an act of Sedition and Treason. Those engaged in Sedition and Treason can not be making laws!  You do not have to get down on one knee to seditionists and traitors - IGNORE THEM! 
 

By the time you have finished this article - you will have on-boarded what many have spent decades or more figuring out! You will no longer have any excuse for conspiring in your own death or building the prison planet to enslave your own children as your Human farmers have intended! Once you have awoken you should feel compelled to become part of the solution to expand and accelerate global awakening! Once enough wake up we can then all get on with building heaven on Earth and terminating once and for all the NWO agenda exposed herein!

Be absolutely clear that those that belong to the NWO cult do not care about you and they never did!  All you are to them is a means to an end! You are simply a Human Resource - a battery - to power the NWO machine.  If they can keep you blindly enslaving yourself and feeding the NWO Prison matrix then they are contented!  That is until they no longer need humanity - which is rapidly approaching!

The thing they want the least is for you to awaken! They do not want you reading at this site or those linked to it! For - it is true - once you take the Red Pill there is no turning back and those that have enslaved you will no longer have any power over you again. 

Does this all sound to crazy to you! Is cognitive dissonance setting in: http://www.1776reloaded.org/joomla30/index.php/how-the-nwo-makes-you-its-slave-cognitive-dissonance-through-your-daily-news-and-military-brainwash-on-social-media 

Those occupying your country have no allegiance to a nation - a community or a people. The NWO cult have sold their souls to a demonic fantasy that goes against EVERYTHING that America once embraced before it was corrupted from within! 

It was Marcus Tullius Cicero that reportedly stated that:

“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear.” 

TONA is how we undo the NEW WORLD ORDER and separate their hands from around our necks! You have no excuse to bow down to the authority of the openly corrupted! DO not consent to their tyranny! You should also realize that - to support International terrorists is a crime in of itself and it is your reason to NOT SUPPORT terrorists pretending to be government! 

This advice applies to the world community being strangled by Rothschilds Zionist institutions including the World Bank, the IMF, the FED, BIS - all part of the money changers swindle. Yet - the grief caused by this scam continues to be blamed on the American people:

... As one prominent Brazilian politician, Luis Ignacio Silva, put it.

"Without being radical or overly bold, I will tell you that the Third World War has already started - a silent war, not for that reason any the less sinister. This war is tearing down Brazil, Latin America and practically all the Third World. Instead of soldiers dying there are children, instead of millions of wounded there are millions of unemployed; instead of destruction of bridges there is the tearing down of factories, schools, hospitals, and entire economies . . . It is a war by the United States ZIONIST OCCUPIED UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT CORPORATION OCCUPYING AMERICA against the Latin American continent and the Third World. It is a war over the foreign debt, one which has as its main weapon interest, a weapon more deadly than the atom bomb, more shattering than a laser beam . ."1 

If a group or organisation had used its hard earned money to help these developing nations, then we might sympathise that there should be a real effort to repay these loans. But the money used was created from fractional reserve banking. The money loaned to the Third World came from the 90% the banks allow themselves to loan on the 10% they actually held. It didn't exist, it was created from nothing, and now people are suffering and dying in an effort to pay it back. 

This has gone beyond clever financing, it's whole sale murder and it's time we stopped it. We can!

1. Luis Ignacio Silva, at the Havana Debt Conference in August 1985, quoted by Susan George, A Fate Worse Than Death p 238

We as the people of the world have the ability to end this insanity right now but you cant fix something until you understand it! 

Please unlearn - re-educate and pass forward on the knowledge that everything you have been told by government and their NWO media is a lie! Understand the NWO agenda referenced below on this site and then look at the words of the so called politicians and the plots being spun on edu-tRainment - and enter-tRainment TV to see how you are supposed to fall for the NWO Social engineering! 

Please note that the UNITED STATES Corporation of the DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA originally created under the Act of 1871 is One leg of the New World Order triumvirate stool working on the enslavement of humanity.

The current US Corp is a successor to the US entity created through the Organic Act of 1871 without delegated authority of the states or the people by agents of the Black Nobility crime syndicates that were exposed in the congressional record in 1916 in the outing of the Secret Treaty of Verona 1822This exposed the Old World Crime syndicates represented by the Crown (Corp. of London) - Holy See and their sycophants and their plan t destroy we the people representative governance. 

 

 


FRAUD

 

  • Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137: “The Constitution of these United States is the supreme law of the land. Any law that is repugnant to the Constitution is null and void of law.”
  • Murdock v. Penn., 319 US 105: “No state shall convert a liberty into a privilege, license it, and attach a fee to it.”
  • Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham, 373 US 262: “If the state converts a liberty into a privilege, the citizen can engage in the right with impunity.”
  • U.S. v. Bishop, 412 US 346: If you have relied on prior decisions of the supreme Court, you have the perfect defense for willfulness.
  • Owen v. Independence, 100 S.C.T. 1398, 445 US 622: “Officers of the court have no immunity, when violating a Constitutional right, from liability. For they are deemed to know the law.”
  • Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 1974: Expounds upon Owen Byers v. U.S., 273 U.S. 28 Unlawful search and seizure. Your rights must be interpreted in favor of the citizen.
  • Boyd v. U.S., 116 U.S. 616: “The court is to protect against any encroachment of Constitutionally secured liberties.”
  • Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436: “Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation, which would abrogate them.”
  • Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425: “An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed.”
  • Miller v. U.S., 230 F.2d. 486, 489: “The claim and exercise of a Constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime.”
  • Brady v. U.S., 397 U.S. 742, 748: “Waivers of Constitutional Rights, not only must they be voluntary, they must be knowingly intelligent acts done with sufficient awareness.” “If men, through fear, fraud, or mistake, should in terms renounce or give up any natural right, the eternal law of reason and the grand end of society would absolutely vacate such renunciation. The right to freedom being a gift of ALMIGHTY GOD, it is not in the power of man to alienate this gift and voluntarily become a slave.” —Samuel Adams, 1772
  • United States v. Sandford, Fed. Case No.16, 221 (C.Ct.D.C. 1806): “In the early days of our Republic, ‘prosecutor’ was simply anyone who voluntarily went before the grand Jury with a complaint.”
  • Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1, 78 S.Ct. 1401 (1958): “No state legislator or executive or judicial officer can war against the Constitution without violating his undertaking to support it.”
  • “A bill of attainder is defined to be ‘a legislative Act which inflects punishment without judicial trial’”
  • “...where the legislative body exercises the office of judge, and assumes judicial magistracy, and pronounces on the guilt of a party without any of the forms or safeguards of a trial, and fixes the punishment.” In re De Giacomo, (1874) 12 Blatchf. (U.S.): 391, 7 Fed. Cas No. 3,747, citing Cummings v. Missouri, (1866) 4 Wall, (U.S.) 323. US v. Will, 449 US 200,216, 101 S Ct, 471, 66 L.Ed2nd 392, 406 (1980)
  • Cohens v. Virginia, 19 US (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L.Ed 257 (1821): “When a judge acts where he or she does not have jurisdiction to act, the judge is engaged in an act or acts of treason.”
  • Mattox v. U.S., 156 US 237, 243: “We are bound to interpret the Constitution in the light of the law as it existed at the time it was adopted.”
  • S. Carolina v. U.S., 199 U.S. 437, 448 (1905): “The Constitution is a written instrument. As such, its meaning does not alter. That which it meant when it was adopted, it means now.”
  • United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1876): “The people of the United States resident within any State are subject to two governments: one State, and the other National, but there need be no conflict between the two.”
  • Grosjean v. American Press Co., 56 S.Ct. 444, 446, 297 U.S. 233, 80 L.Ed 660: “Freedom in enjoyment and use of all of one’s powers, faculties and property.”
  • ARGERSINGER v. HAMLIN, 407 U.S. 25 (1972): “The right of an indigent defendant in a criminal trial to the assistance of counsel, which is guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment… is not governed by the classification of the offense or by whether or not a jury trial is required. No accused may be deprived of his liberty as the result of any criminal prosecution, whether felony or misdemeanor, in which he was denied the assistance of counsel.”
  • U.S. v. Prudden, 424 F.2d. 1021; U.S. v. Tweel, 550 F. 2d. 297, 299, 300 (1977): Silence can only be equated with fraud when there is a legal and moral duty to speak or when an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally misleading. We cannot condone this shocking conduct... If that is the case we hope our message is clear. This sort of deception will not be tolerated and if this is routine it should be corrected immediately.
  • Morrison v. Coddington, 662 P. 2d. 155, 135 Ariz. 480 (1983): Fraud and deceit may arise from silence where there is a duty to speak the truth, as well as from speaking an untruth. In regard to courts of record: “If the court is not in the exercise of its general jurisdiction, but of some special statutory jurisdiction, it is as to such proceeding an inferior court, and not aided by presumption in favor of jurisdiction.”
  • 1 Smith's Leading Cases, 816: In regard to courts of inferior jurisdiction, “if the record does not show upon its face the facts necessary to give jurisdiction, they will be presumed not to have existed.”

Norman v. Zieber, 3 Or at 202-03: It is interesting to note the repeated references to fraud in the above quotes. Therefore the meaning of fraud should be noted: 

Fraud. An intentional perversion of truth for the purpose of inducing another in reliance upon it to part with some valuable thing belonging to him or to surrender a legal right. A false representation of a matter of fact… which deceives and is intended to deceive another so that he shall act upon it to his legal injury. 

… It consists of some deceitful practice or willful device, resorted to with intent to deprive another of his right, or in some manner to do him injury… (Emphasis added) 

–Black’s Law Dictionary Fifth Edition, page 594. 

Then take into account the case of McNally v. U.S., 483 U.S. 350, 371-372, Quoting U.S. v Holzer, 816 F.2d. 304, 307 Fraud in its elementary common law sense of deceit… includes the deliberate concealment of material information in a setting of fiduciary obligation. A public official is a fiduciary toward the public,… and if he deliberately conceals material information from them he is guilty of fraud.


VOID JUDGEMENTS

As we have noted - the Physical state of California is a common law state, not subject to statutes, BAR attorneys per TONA yet these injustices have been foisted over the nation since the Coup of the 1860's. Even though this is the case - illegal orders even a de facto Court of the UNITED STATES Federal Corporation are VOID per settled law on void judgments.  
 
  • A judgment is void on its face if the trial court exceeded its jurisdiction by granting relief that it had no power to grant. Jurisdiction cannot be conferred on a trial court by the consent of the parties. (Summers v. Superior Court (1959) 53 Cal. 2d 295, 298 [1 Cal. Rptr. 324, 347 P.2d 668]; Roberts v. Roberts (1966) 241 Cal. App. 2d 93, 101 [50 Cal. Rptr. 408].)
  • The court may . . . on motion of either party after notice to the other party, set aside any void judgment or order.’ (For a discussion of the 1933 amendments to section 473 see Estate of Estrem, 16 Cal. 2d 563, 572 [107].
  • “Motions to vacate void judgments may be made at any time after judgment.”(County of Ventura v. Tillett, supra, 133 Cal. App. 3d 105, 110.).
  • “[A] court may set aside a void order at anytime. An appeal will not prevent the court from at any time lopping off what has been termed a dead limb on the judicial tree—a void order.” (MacMillan Petroleum Corp. v. Griffin (1950) 99 Cal. App. 2d 523, 533 [222 P.2d 69]; accord: People v. West Coast Shows, Inc. (1970) 10 Cal. App. 3d 462, 467 [89 Cal. Rptr. 290]; Svistunoff v. Svistunoff (1952) 108 Cal. App. 2d 638, 641 -642 [239 P.2d 650]; and see: 6 Witkin, Cal. Procedure (2d ed. 1971) Appeal, § 7, pp. 4024-4025.)
  • Time limitation does not apply where the judgment is based on a fraudulent return. (Washkov. Stewart, supra, p. 318; Richert v. Benson Lbr. Co., supra, p. 677.).
  •  it is true that the statute of imitations does not apply to as uit in equity to vacate a void judgment. (Cadenasso v. Bank of Italy, supra, p. 569; Estate of Pusey, 180 Cal. 368, 374 [181 P. 648].) This rule holds as to all void judgments, in two other cases, People v. Massengale and In re Sandel, the courts hearing the respective appeals confirmed the judicial power and responsibility to correct void judgments (in excess of jurisdiction).
  • “Obviously a judgment, though final and on the merits, has no binding force and is subject to collateral attack if it is wholly void for lack of jurisdiction of the subject matter or person, and perhaps for excess of jurisdiction, or where it is obtained by extrinsic fraud.” (7 Witkin, Cal. Procedure, supra, Judgment, § 286, p. 828.). Courts also have inherent power to set aside a void judgment. (Reid v. Balter (1993) 14 Cal.App.4th 1186, 1194.).
  • “...the eviction of homeowners following foreclosure raises due process issues and can not be heard as part of summary unlawful detainer proceeding. Issues extrinsic to the right of possession are generally excluded even though they arise out of the parties’ landlord-tenant relationship. E.S. Bills, Inc. v Tzucanow (1985) 38 C3d 824, 830, 215 CR 278; Saberi v Bakhtiari (1985) 169 CA3d 509, 515, 215 CR 359. However, an action for unlawful detainer may coexist with other causes of action in the same complaint, as long as the entire case is treated as a regular civil action and not as a summary proceeding. Lynch & Freytag v Cooper (1990) 218 CA3d 603, 608–609, 267 CR 189 (rejecting defendant’s contention that unlawful detainer proceeding can be converted into regular civil action only when possession of the property is no longer in issue).[Judges Benchguide 31, 2011]
  • U.S. Supreme Court precedents hold that fraud upon the court vitiates the case that all orders and judgments are regarded as nullities and void. (See U.S. v. Throckmorton, 98 U.S. 61, 64, 66 (1878); Valley v. Northern Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 254 U.S. 348, 353-354 (1920)).
  • In the case of Sturgeon v. County of Los Angeles, 167 Cal.App.4th 630 (2008), rev. denied 12/23/08, it was found that the payments that the County was making to the judiciary violated Article VI, Section 19, of the California Constitution as only the State Legislature could “prescribe” the “compensation” of judges,
  • The U.S. Supreme Court held that Judge Benjamin should have recused himself. It stated in Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co., Inc., 556 U.S. ___ (2009), Slip Opinion page 16, in relevant part: Just as no man is allowed to be a judge in his own cause, similar fears of bias can arise when—without the consent of the other parties—a man chooses the judge in his own cause.
  • CCP Section 170.1(a)(6)(A)(iii) mandated such judge’s disqualification. Such Section states: A judge shall be disqualified if any one or more of the following is true: A person aware of the facts might reasonably entertain a doubt that the judge would be able to be impartial.
  • 
  • Canon 3E(2) requires the judge to: disclose on the record information that is reasonably relevant to the question of disqualification under Code of Civil Procedure section 170.1, even if the judge believes there is no actual basis for disqualification.
  • Canon 3E(1) requires the judge to “disqualify himself or herself in any proceeding in which disqualification is required by law.”
  • After the Sturgeon decision, the legislature enacted Senate Bill SBx2-11, which recognized that the County payments to judges were criminal. Senate Bill SBx2-11 gave retroactive immunity, effective 5/21/09, from criminal prosecution, civil liability and disciplinary action to a “governmental entity, officer, or employee of a governmental entity,” including judges who were paid or received “judicial benefits.” The retroactive immunity did not extend to the judge’s actions of presiding over cases in which the county who paid them was a party. Nor, did it extend to county payments received after 5/21/09. At all times, judges who accepted “bribes” from an interested party were biased. The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled and has reaffirmed the principle that “justice must satisfy the appearance of justice,” Levine v. United States, 362 U.S. 610, 616, 80 S.Ct.1038 (1960), citing Offutt v. United States, 348 U.S. 11, 14, 75 S.Ct. 11, 13 (1954). Therefore, a judge receiving a bribe from an interested party over which he is presiding does not give the appearance of justice.
  • Further, the judge receiving the payment may be prosecuted for violating the intangible right to honest services under Federal law, 18 U.S.C. § 1346. The U.S. Supreme Court held in Skilling v. United States, 561 U.S. ____ (decided 6/24/2010), Slip Opinion pages 48-49, that § 1346 encompasses bribery and kickbacks; that if the Federal Court Judges and/or Magistrates were not likewise involved in these frauds;
  • Redress is defined in Black’s Law 5th Edition as:“ Redress. Satisfaction for an injury or damages sustained. Damages or equitable relief. See Recovery; Restitution”. Recovery is defined in the same as being: “In its most extensive sense, the restoration or vindication of a right existing in a person, by the formal judgment or decree of a competent court, at his instance and suit, or the obtaining, by such judgment, of some right or property which has been taken or withheld from him. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Wood, 242 Ark. 879, 416 S.W.2d 322, 327.This is also called a “true” recovery, to distinguish it from a “feigned” or “common” recovery.” And indeed Restitution is defined as the: “Act of restoring; restoration; restoration of anything to its rightful owner; the act of making good or giving equivalent for any loss, damage or injury; and indemnification. State v. Barnett, 110 Vt. 221, 3 A.2d 521, 525, 526. Restoration of status quo and is amount which would put plaintiff in as good a position as he would have been if no contract had been made and restores to plaintiff value of what he parted with in performing contract. Explorers Motor Home Corp. v. Aldridge, Tex.Civ.App., 541 S.W.2d 851, 852. A person who has been unjustly enriched at the expense of another is required to make restitution to the other. Restatement of the Law, Restitution, § 1.”
  • Regular on its Face—“Process is said to be “regular on its face” when it proceeds from the court officer, or body having authority of law to issue process of that nature, and which is legal in form, and contains nothing to notify, or fairly apprise any one that it is issued without authority.”

____________

  • In Anlaby v. Praetorius (1888) 20 Q.B.D. 764 at 769 Fry L.J. stated on the issue of void proceedings that:
  • “A plaintiff has no right to obtain any judgement at all”.
  • A void order does not have to be obeyed because, for example, in Crane v Director of Public Prosecutions [1921] it was stated that if an order is void ab initio (from the beginning) then there is no real order of the Court.
  • In Fry v. Moore (1889), 23 Q.B.D. 395 Lindley, L.J. said of void and irregular proceedings that it may be difficult to draw the exact line between nullity and irregularity. If a procedure is irregular it can be waived by the defendant but if it is null it cannot be waived and all that is done afterwards is void; in general, one can easily see on which side of the line the particular case falls.
  • A void order results from a ‘fundamental defect’ in proceedings (Upjohn LJ in Re Pritchard (deceased) [1963] 1 Ch 502 and Lord Denning in Firman v Ellis [1978] 3 WLR 1) or from a ‘without jurisdiction’/ultra vires act of a public body or judicial office holder (Lord Denning in Pearlman v Governors of Harrow School [1978] 3 WLR 736).
  • A ‘fundamental defect’ includes a failure to serve process where service of process is required (Lord Greene in Craig v Kanssen Craig v Kanssen [1943] 1 KB 256); or where service of proceedings never came to the notice of the defendant at all (e.g. he was abroad and was unaware of the service of proceedings); or where there is a fundamental defect in the issuing of proceedings so that in effect the proceedings have never started; or where proceedings appear to be duly issued but fail to comply with a statutory requirement (Upjohn LJ in Re Pritchard [1963]). Failure to comply with a statutory requirement includes rules made pursuant to a statute (Smurthwaite v Hannay [1894] A.C. 494).
  • A ‘without jurisdiction’/ultra vires act is any act which a Court did not have power to do (Lord Denning in Firman v Ellis [1978]).
  • In Peacock v Bell and Kendal [1667] 85 E.R. 81, pp.87:88 it was held that nothing shall be intended to be out of the jurisdiction of a Superior Court, but that which specially appears to be so; and nothing shall be intended to be within the jurisdiction of an Inferior Court but that which is so expressly stated.
  • It is important to note therefore that in the case of orders of Courts with unlimited jurisdiction, an order can never be void unless the ‘unlimited jurisdiction’ is ‘limited’ in situations where it is expressly shown to be so. In the case of orders of the Courts of unlimited jurisdiction where the jurisdiction is not expressly shown to be limited, the orders are either irregular or regular. If irregular, it can be set aside by the Court that made it upon application to that Court and a person affected by the irregular order has a right –ex debito justitiae – to have it set aside. If it is regular, it can only be set aside by an appellate Court upon appeal if there is one to which an appeal lies (Lord Diplock in Isaacs v Robertson (1984) 43 W.I.R. PC at 128-130). However, where the Court’s unlimited jurisdiction is shown to be limited (for example: a restriction on the Court’s power by an Act of Parliament or Civil or Criminal Procedure Rule) (Peacock v Bell and Kendal [1667]; Halsbury’s Laws of England) then the doctrine of nullity will apply.
  • Similarly, if the higher Court’s order is founded on a lower Court’s void act or invalid claim then the higher Court’s decision will also be void (Lord Denning in MacFoy v United Africa Co. Ltd. [1961] 3 All ER).
  • The main differences between a ‘void’ and ‘voidable’ order or claim is that:
  • (i) a ‘void’ order or claim has no legal effect ab initio (from the beginning/outset) and therefore does not need to be appealed, although for convenience it may sometimes be necessary to have it set aside (Lord Denning in MacFoy v United Africa Co. Ltd. [1961] and Firman v Ellis [1978]) whereas a ‘voidable’ order or claim has legal effect unless and until it is set aside. Therefore, while a void order or claim does not have to be obeyed and can be ignored and its nullity can be relied on as a defence when necessary (Wandsworth London Borough Council v. Winder [1985] A.C. 461), a voidable order or claim has to be obeyed and cannot be ignored unless and until it is set aside; and
  • (ii) a ‘void’ order can be set aside by the Court which made the order because the Court has inherent jurisdiction to set aside its own void order (Lord Greene in Craig v Kanssen [1943]) whereas a ‘voidable’ order can only be set aside by appeal to an appellate Court.
  • A person affected by both a void or voidable order has the right – ex debito justitiae – to have the order set aside (which means that the Court does not have discretion to refuse to set aside the order or to go into the merits of the case) (Lord Greene in Craig v Kanssen [1943]).
  • The procedure for setting aside a void order is by application to the Court which made the void order, although it can also be set aside by appeal although an appeal is not necessary (Lord Greene in Craig v Kanssen [1943]) or it can quashed or declared invalid by Judicial Review (where available) and where damages may also be claimed.
  • Although an appeal is not necessary to set aside a void order, if permission to appeal is requested and if out of time the Court should grant permission because time does not run because the order is void and the person affected by it has the right to have it set aside (Lord Greene in Craig v Kanssen [1943].
  • A void order is incurably void and all proceedings based on the invalid claim or void act are also void. Even a decision of the higher Courts (High Court, Court of Appeal and Supreme Court) will be void if the decision is founded on an invalid claim or void act, because something cannot be founded on nothing (Lord Denning in MacFoy v United Africa Co. Ltd. [1961]).
  • A void order is void even if it results in a failure of natural justice or injustice to an innocent third party (Lord Denning in Wiseman v Wiseman [1953] 1 All ER 601).
  • It is never too late to raise the issue of nullity and a person can ignore the void order or claim and raise it as a defence when necessary (Wandsworth London Borough Council v. Winder [1985] A.C. 461; Smurthwaite v Hannay [1894] A.C. 494; Upjohn LJ in Re Pritchard (deceased) [1963]; Lord Denning in MacFoy v United Africa Co. Ltd. [1961]).
  • In R v. Clarke and McDaid [2008] UKHL8 the House of Lords confirmed that there is no valid trial if the bill/Indictment has not been signed by an appropriate officer of the Court because Parliament intended that the Indictment be signed by a proper officer of the Court.
  • In Bellinger v Bellinger [2003] UKHL 21 the House of Lords confirmed that a void act is void from the outset and no Court – not even the House of Lords (now the Supreme Court) – has jurisdiction to give legal effect to a void act no matter how unreasonable that may seem, because doing so would mean reforming the law which no Court has power to do because such power rests only with Parliament. The duty of the Court is to interpret and apply the law not reform or create it.
  • It is important to note that if a claim is invalid the plaintiff can start all over again unless he is prevented from doing so due to limitation as in the case of Re Pritchard (deceased) [1963] or estoppel – for example; where the Claimant applied to the Court for permission to correct/amend the claim and permission was refused; or the plaintiff or his solicitor had been negligent in ignoring a material fact when filing the invalid claim so that the plaintiff is estopped by the principle that he should not be allowed a ‘second bite at the cherry’; and in the case of a criminal trial if there has been a fundamental technical defect the Court can order a new trial (venire de novo – may you cause to come anew).

Chronology of some case laws relating to void orders:

1888:

In Anlaby v. Praetorius (1888) Fry L.J. stated on the issue of void proceedings that:

(i) a plaintiff has no right to obtain any judgement at all.

1889:

In Fry v. Moore (1889) Lindley, L.J. said that:

(i) it might be difficult to draw the exact line between nullity and irregularity. If an order is irregular it can be waived by the defendant but if it is null then it renders all that is done afterwards void. In general one can easily see on which side of the line the particular case falls.

1921:

Crane v Director of Public Prosecutions [1921]:

(i) if an order is void ab initio (from the beginning) then there is no real order of the Court.

1943:

In Craig v Kanssen [1943] Lord Greene confirmed that:

(i) an order which can properly be described as a nullity is something which the person affected by it is entitled ex debito justitiae to have set aside;

(ii) so far as procedure is concerned the Court in its ‘inherent jurisdiction’ can set aside its own order and an appeal from the order is not necessary; and

(iii) if permission to appeal is requested and if out of time the Court should grant permission because time does not run because the point is that the order is invalid and the person affected by it has the right to have it set aside.

1953:

In Wiseman v Wiseman [1953] 1 All ER 601 – Lord Denning confirmed that:

(i) The issue of natural justice does not arise in a void order because it is void whether it causes a failure of natural justice or not;

(ii) a claimant or defendant should not be allowed to abuse the process of Court by failing to comply with a statutory procedure and yet keep the benefit of it and for that reason also a void act is void even if it affects the rights of an innocent third party.

1961:

In MacFoy v United Africa Co Ltd. [1961] Lord Denning confirmed that:

(i) a void order is automatically void without more ado;

(ii) a void order does not have to be set aside by a Court to render it void although for convenience it may sometimes be necessary to have the Court set the void order aside;

(iii) a void order is incurably void and all proceedings based on the void order/invalid claim are also void.

1963:

In Re Pritchard (deceased) [1963] Upjohn LJ confirmed that:

(i) a fundamental defect in proceedings will make the whole proceedings a nullity;

(ii) a nullity cannot be waived;

(iii) it is never too late to raise the issue of nullity; and

(iv) a person affected by a void order has the right – ex debito justitiae – to have it set aside.

1978:

In Firman v Ellis [1978] Lord Denning confirmed that:

(i) a void act is void ab initio

1979:

Lord Denning, in his book ‘The Discipline of Law’ – Butterworths 1979 – page 77, states:

(i) although a void order has no legal effect from the outset it may sometimes be necessary to have it set aside because as Lord Radcliffe once said: “It bears no brand of invalidity on its forehead”.

1985:

Wandsworth London Borough Council v. Winder [1985] A.C. 461:

(i) a person may ignore a void claim and rely on it as a defence when necessary.

2003:

In Bellinger v Bellinger [2003] the House of Lords confirmed that:

(i) a void act is void from the outset; and

(ii) no Court – not even the House of Lords (now the Supreme Court) has jurisdiction to give legal effect to a void act no matter how unreasonable that may seem because doing so would mean reforming the laws which no Court has power to do because such power rests only with Parliament. The duty of the Court is to interpret and apply the law not reform it.

Conclusion based on the case laws referred to above:

(i) an application to have a void order set aside can be made to the Court which made the void order;

(ii) the setting aside must be done under the Court’s inherent power to set aside its own void order;

(iii) the Court does not have discretion to refuse the application because the person affected by the void order has a right to have it set aside;

(iv) an appeal is not necessary because the order is already void;

(v) if permission to appeal is sought and if sought out of time permission should be given because as the order is void time does not run; it is never too late to raise the issue of nullity; and the person affected by the void order has a right to have it set aside;

(vi) a void order can be quashed or declared unlawful by Judicial Review where available and where damages may also be claimed;

(vii) the whole proceedings is void if it was based on a void act;

(viii) a void order does not have to be obeyed because it has no legal effect from the beginning;

(ix) as it is never too late to raise the issue of nullity a person can ignore the void order and rely on nullity as a defence when necessary;

(x) a void order is void even if the nullity is unjust or injustice occurs to an innocent third party;

(xi) an order of a Court of unlimited jurisdiction is only void if it can be expressly be shown that the unlimited jurisdiction is limited in that situation, or the order is founded on an invalid claim or void act;

(xii) no Court (not even the Supreme Court) has jurisdiction to give effect to a void act and the duty of the Court is only to interpret and apply the law not to reform or create it as such power rests only with Parliament.


KEY REFERENCES TO US TYRANNY

ALL FOREIGN CROWN US COURTS ARE MILITARY COURTS DISPLAY DC US COLORS - BUT OPERATING ILLEGALLY  THIS SCAM WAS ESTABLISHED NOT BY A WE THE PEOPLE GOVERNMENT BUT BY A PRIVATE CRIMINAL CARTEL. 

ACT of 1871 CREATING A PONZI SCHEME UNITED STATES CORPORATION UNDER FOREIGN CONTROL

Pope Pius Creating NORTH AMERICAN ACT to take control of North America for the HOLY SEE

ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS ILLEGAL

MARTIAL WAR POWERS - NO SEPERATION OF BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT (HR 1328 1871)

TITLES OF NOBILITY ACT THAT RENDERS ALL OF THE ABOVE ACTS VOID.